PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COYY vs. STPZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COYY vs. STPZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COYY achieves a -30.87% return, which is significantly lower than STPZ's 1.01% return.


COYY

1D
-1.04%
1M
-6.93%
YTD
-30.87%
6M
-36.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

STPZ

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.36%
YTD
1.01%
6M
1.22%
1Y
3.26%
3Y*
4.81%
5Y*
2.83%
10Y*
2.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COYY vs. STPZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF
-30.87%-40.04%
STPZ
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
1.01%1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between COYY and STPZ is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2025

-0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COYY vs. STPZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


STPZ
STPZ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
STPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
STPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
STPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
STPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COYY vs. STPZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF (COYY) and PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COYYSTPZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

COYY vs. STPZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COYY vs. STPZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COYY drawdown since its inception was -59.60%, which is greater than STPZ's maximum drawdown of -6.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COYY and STPZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COYYSTPZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.60%

-6.77%

-52.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.30%

-0.87%

-58.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.43%

-1.30%

-35.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

Volatility

COYY vs. STPZ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COYYSTPZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.41%

1.95%

+33.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.41%

3.29%

+32.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.41%

2.99%

+32.42%

COYY vs. STPZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

COYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than STPZ's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

COYY vs. STPZ - Dividend Comparison

COYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 414.70%, more than STPZ's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST COIN ETF
414.70%132.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STPZ
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF
4.14%3.65%1.97%1.63%5.88%3.65%1.86%1.76%2.23%1.51%0.65%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


COYY and STPZ have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, STPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

STPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for COYY.

COYY has the higher dividend yield at 414.70%, compared with 4.14% for STPZ.

COYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while STPZ is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for COYY and 0.20% for STPZ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COYY and STPZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer