PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COWZ vs. SGOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COWZ vs. SGOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 6.41% return, which is significantly higher than SGOV's 1.56% return.


COWZ

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.81%
YTD
6.41%
6M
7.19%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*

SGOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.28%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.80%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COWZ vs. SGOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
6.41%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%30.03%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
1.56%4.24%5.27%5.12%1.58%0.04%0.05%

Correlation

The correlation between COWZ and SGOV is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2020

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COWZ vs. SGOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SGOV
SGOV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SGOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGOV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SGOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGOV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWZ vs. SGOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COWZSGOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-18.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-273.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

195.55

-194.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

398.20

-394.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.52

4,461.99

-4,451.47

COWZ vs. SGOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is lower than the SGOV Sharpe Ratio of 20.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWZ and SGOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COWZSGOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74

20.28

-18.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

14.78

-14.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

12.50

-11.86

Drawdowns

COWZ vs. SGOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, which is greater than SGOV's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and SGOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COWZSGOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.63%

-0.03%

-38.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.00%

-0.01%

-4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.00%

-0.01%

-21.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-0.03%

-21.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.53%

0.00%

-2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.80%

-0.00%

-4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

0.00%

+1.84%

Volatility

COWZ vs. SGOV - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF (SGOV) at 0.06%. This indicates that COWZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SGOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COWZSGOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

0.06%

+2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.21%

0.13%

+7.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.16%

0.20%

+10.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.64%

0.24%

+17.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.92%

0.24%

+19.68%

COWZ vs. SGOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SGOV's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

COWZ vs. SGOV - Dividend Comparison

COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.94%, less than SGOV's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.94%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%
SGOV
iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
3.85%4.10%5.10%4.87%1.45%0.03%0.05%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COWZ and SGOV have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COWZ has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to SGOV (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWZ dropped -38.63% vs SGOV's -0.03%.

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.11% vs 3.55% for SGOV. On fees, SGOV is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SGOV has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.11% return vs 3.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SGOV is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for COWZ.

SGOV has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 1.94% for COWZ.

COWZ is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SGOV is Ultrashort Bond. COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COWZ and 0.09% for SGOV.

SGOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (20.28 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COWZ and SGOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer