PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COWZ vs. PTLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COWZ vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 8.18% return, which is significantly higher than PTLC's 5.53% return.


COWZ

1D
-0.34%
1M
2.61%
YTD
8.18%
6M
9.03%
1Y
22.23%
3Y*
14.44%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*

PTLC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.98%
YTD
5.53%
6M
5.49%
1Y
21.41%
3Y*
14.93%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
11.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COWZ vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
8.18%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%23.41%-10.05%20.22%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
5.53%5.10%24.31%16.78%-8.62%27.90%-1.15%17.58%1.49%21.41%

Correlation

The correlation between COWZ and PTLC is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2016

0.62

The correlation between COWZ and PTLC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

COWZ vs. PTLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COWZ
PTLC

Healthcare

21.8%
8.5%

Energy

16.9%
3.5%

Technology

16.0%
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

10.9%
4.9%

Communication Services

10.4%
11.2%

Industrials

8.4%
8.3%

Basic Materials

3.7%
1.8%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Healthcare

COWZ
21.8%
PTLC
8.5%

Energy

COWZ
16.9%
PTLC
3.5%

Technology

COWZ
16.0%
PTLC
35.6%

Consumer Cyclical

COWZ
11.7%
PTLC
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

COWZ
10.9%
PTLC
4.9%

Communication Services

COWZ
10.4%
PTLC
11.2%

Industrials

COWZ
8.4%
PTLC
8.3%

Basic Materials

COWZ
3.7%
PTLC
1.8%

Financial Services

COWZ

-

PTLC
11.8%

Real Estate

COWZ

-

PTLC
1.9%

Utilities

COWZ

-

PTLC
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COWZ vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PTLC
PTLC Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PTLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
PTLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTLC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COWZ vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COWZPTLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.02

1.91

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.98

2.55

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.34

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.46

2.45

+2.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.19

9.71

+2.49

COWZ vs. PTLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COWZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the PTLC Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COWZ and PTLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COWZPTLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

1.91

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.92

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.70

-0.06

Drawdowns

COWZ vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, which is greater than PTLC's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and PTLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COWZPTLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.63%

-26.63%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.00%

-8.77%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.00%

-15.17%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-15.17%

-6.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-0.74%

-0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-5.64%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.21%

-0.38%

Volatility

COWZ vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) is 2.56%, while Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) has a volatility of 2.88%. This indicates that COWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COWZPTLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

2.88%

-0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

8.15%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.13%

11.27%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.63%

11.73%

+5.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.93%

13.17%

+6.76%

COWZ vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

COWZ vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison

COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, more than PTLC's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.99%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%0.00%
PTLC
Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF
1.01%1.06%0.67%1.18%1.26%0.73%1.08%1.10%1.00%0.97%1.08%0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


COWZ and PTLC have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTLC has higher volatility (2.88%) compared to COWZ (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWZ dropped -38.63% vs PTLC's -26.63%.

On 5-year performance, PTLC leads with 10.72% vs 10.57% for COWZ. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, COWZ has been the lower-risk option at 2.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PTLC has performed better with a 10.72% return vs 10.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTLC.

COWZ has the higher dividend yield at 1.99%, compared with 1.01% for PTLC.

COWZ is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while PTLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for COWZ and 0.60% for PTLC.

COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COWZ and PTLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer