COWZ vs. LIWPX
COWZ (Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF) and LIWPX (BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund) are both funds - COWZ is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index, while LIWPX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 5 years, COWZ returned 10.54%/yr vs 9.76%/yr for LIWPX. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COWZ charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LIWPX.
Performance
COWZ vs. LIWPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWZ achieves a 8.02% return, which is significantly lower than LIWPX's 10.50% return.
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 4.66%
- 6M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 8.02%
- 1Y
- 18.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.05%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.62%
LIWPX
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- 6M
- 7.41%
- YTD
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- 21.10%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.31%
COWZ vs. LIWPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 8.02% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 14.73% | 0.19% | 42.57% | 11.65% | 4.31% |
LIWPX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund | 10.50% | 21.32% | 14.17% | 21.22% | -18.52% | 18.51% | 15.12% | 5.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between COWZ and LIWPX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2019 | 0.76 |
Over the past year, the correlation between COWZ and LIWPX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COWZ vs. LIWPX — Risk / Return Rank
COWZ
LIWPX
COWZ vs. LIWPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COWZ | LIWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.20 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.70 | 9.37 | -0.67 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COWZ vs. LIWPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWZ drawdown since its inception was -38.63%, which is greater than LIWPX's maximum drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWZ and LIWPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWZ | LIWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.63% | -33.12% | -5.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.95% | -9.57% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.00% | -16.97% | -5.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.00% | -26.57% | +4.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.06% | -2.30% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.78% | -5.80% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 2.24% | -0.12% |
Volatility
COWZ vs. LIWPX - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund (LIWPX) have volatilities of 3.90% and 3.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COWZ | LIWPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | 3.80% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.09% | 11.45% | -3.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.51% | 13.61% | -2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 16.00% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | 18.53% | +1.33% |
COWZ vs. LIWPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWZ has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than LIWPX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
COWZ vs. LIWPX - Dividend Comparison
COWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than LIWPX's 1.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.91% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
LIWPX BlackRock LifePath Index 2065 Fund | 1.41% | 1.57% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 1.50% | 1.58% | 1.13% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COWZ and LIWPX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COWZ has higher volatility (3.90%) compared to LIWPX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWZ dropped -38.63% vs LIWPX's -33.12%.
COWZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COWZ and LIWPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer