COWG vs. PTNQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ).
COWG and PTNQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COWG is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders Index. It was launched on Dec 21, 2022. PTNQ is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. It was launched on Jun 11, 2015. Both COWG and PTNQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
COWG vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COWG vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | -3.92% | 10.24% | 34.99% | 20.69% | -0.68% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | -6.66% | 7.18% | 15.47% | 34.65% | 0.08% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWG achieves a -3.92% return, which is significantly higher than PTNQ's -6.66% return.
COWG
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -3.92%
- 6M
- -7.05%
- 1Y
- 9.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTNQ
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- -6.66%
- 6M
- -4.97%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- 11.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 13.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COWG vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COWG vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank
COWG
PTNQ
COWG vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COWG | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.41 | 0.27 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.74 | 0.45 | +0.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.06 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 0.36 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.55 | 1.06 | +1.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COWG | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 | 0.27 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.93 | 0.69 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between COWG and PTNQ is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
COWG vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison
COWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than PTNQ's 0.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWG Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.35% | 0.32% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.94% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
Drawdowns
COWG vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWG drawdown since its inception was -23.60%, smaller than the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWG and PTNQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWG | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.60% | -28.07% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.96% | -11.76% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.98% | -9.74% | +1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.36% | -5.74% | +2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 4.05% | -0.05% |
Volatility
COWG vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) have volatilities of 5.87% and 5.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COWG | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 5.77% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 12.61% | +0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.50% | 15.32% | +7.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 12.71% | +6.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.32% | 16.30% | +3.02% |