COTG vs. TEK
COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) and TEK (iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while TEK is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
COTG vs. TEK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly lower than TEK's 33.41% return.
COTG
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -14.02%
- 6M
- -8.55%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TEK
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 30.48%
- YTD
- 33.41%
- 1Y
- 45.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COTG vs. TEK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 4.79% | -22.61% |
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF | 33.41% | -0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between COTG and TEK is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | -0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COTG vs. TEK — Risk / Return Rank
COTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TEK
COTG vs. TEK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF (TEK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COTG | TEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COTG vs. TEK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -32.16%, which is greater than TEK's maximum drawdown of -28.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and TEK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTG | TEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.16% | -28.24% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -19.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.65% | -7.41% | -24.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -5.89% | -4.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.96% | — |
Volatility
COTG vs. TEK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COTG | TEK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.87% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.97% | 30.69% | +10.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.97% | 31.29% | +9.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.97% | 31.29% | +9.68% |
COTG vs. TEK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both COTG and TEK have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
COTG vs. TEK - Dividend Comparison
COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TEK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TEK iShares Technology Opportunities Active ETF | 1.19% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COTG and TEK have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG and TEK have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
TEK has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
COTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TEK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares.
Find the right allocation for COTG and TEK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer