COTG vs. TECL
COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) and TECL (Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. COTG is actively managed, while TECL is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. COTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for TECL.
Performance
COTG vs. TECL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 14.10% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 104.37% return.
COTG
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -15.48%
- YTD
- 14.10%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TECL
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 15.41%
- YTD
- 104.37%
- 6M
- 98.56%
- 1Y
- 218.70%
- 3Y*
- 73.29%
- 5Y*
- 37.90%
- 10Y*
- 54.55%
COTG vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 14.10% | -22.61% |
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares | 104.37% | 11.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between COTG and TECL is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COTG vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank
COTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TECL
COTG vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COTG | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.09 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COTG vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum TECL drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and TECL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTG | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.69% | -77.96% | +52.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -46.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -66.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -77.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -77.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.58% | -12.23% | -13.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -18.38% | +8.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.79% | — |
Volatility
COTG vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COTG | TECL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 35.62% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 57.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.09% | 68.99% | -28.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.09% | 75.28% | -35.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.09% | 73.00% | -32.91% |
COTG vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison
COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
COTG vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison
COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TECL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TECL Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares | 3.48% | 7.19% | 0.29% | 0.28% | 0.22% | 0.32% | 0.52% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COTG and TECL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.91% for TECL.
TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.48%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 0.91% for TECL.
Find the right allocation for COTG and TECL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer