PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COTG vs. NTSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COTG vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


COTG

1D
1.39%
1M
-11.21%
YTD
17.32%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NTSD

1D
-1.11%
1M
7.13%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTG vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COTG and NTSD is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

-0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COTG vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COTG vs. NTSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COTGNTSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.28

5.08

-5.36

Drawdowns

COTG vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and NTSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COTGNTSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.69%

-5.20%

-20.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.48%

-1.11%

-22.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-0.84%

-7.51%

Volatility

COTG vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COTGNTSDDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.65%

24.28%

+16.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.65%

24.28%

+16.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.65%

24.28%

+16.37%

COTG vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

COTG vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

Neither COTG nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COTG and NTSD have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for COTG.

COTG and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 0.35% for NTSD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COTG and NTSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer