COTG vs. IGM
COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) and IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COTG is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while IGM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. COTG is actively managed, while IGM is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions. COTG charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGM.
Performance
COTG vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 4.79% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 25.21% return.
COTG
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- -14.02%
- 6M
- -8.55%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGM
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.45%
- 6M
- 23.31%
- YTD
- 25.21%
- 1Y
- 43.98%
- 3Y*
- 35.45%
- 5Y*
- 19.02%
- 10Y*
- 24.38%
COTG vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 4.79% | -22.61% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 25.21% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between COTG and IGM is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | -0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COTG vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
COTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IGM
COTG vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COTG | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COTG vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -32.16%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COTG | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.16% | -65.59% | +33.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.65% | -5.45% | -26.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -15.19% | +4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.14% | — |
Volatility
COTG vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COTG | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.97% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.97% | 23.31% | +17.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.97% | 26.18% | +14.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.97% | 24.74% | +16.23% |
COTG vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IGM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
COTG vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.14% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COTG and IGM have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for COTG.
IGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.
COTG is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IGM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 0.39% for IGM.
Find the right allocation for COTG and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer