PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COTG vs. BU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COTG vs. BU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long B ETF (BU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COTG achieves a 17.32% return, which is significantly higher than BU's -20.39% return.


COTG

1D
1.39%
1M
-11.21%
YTD
17.32%
6M
1.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BU

1D
-5.94%
1M
15.42%
YTD
-20.39%
6M
-9.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COTG vs. BU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COTG and BU is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2025

-0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COTG vs. BU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long B ETF (BU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COTG vs. BU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COTGBUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.28

0.06

-0.34

Drawdowns

COTG vs. BU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COTG drawdown since its inception was -25.69%, smaller than the maximum BU drawdown of -53.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COTG and BU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COTGBUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.69%

-53.98%

+28.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.48%

-45.10%

+21.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-25.32%

+16.97%

Volatility

COTG vs. BU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COTGBUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.65%

97.59%

-56.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.65%

97.59%

-56.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.65%

97.59%

-56.94%

COTG vs. BU - Expense Ratio Comparison

COTG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BU's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

COTG vs. BU - Dividend Comparison

Neither COTG nor BU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


COTG and BU have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for BU.

COTG and BU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for COTG and 1.29% for BU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COTG and BU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer