PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSW vs. ROCQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSW vs. ROCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


COSW

1D
0.92%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
12.13%
6M
2.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ROCQ

1D
-0.12%
1M
6.49%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSW vs. ROCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between COSW and ROCQ is -0.28, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2026

-0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSW vs. ROCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COSW vs. ROCQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COSWROCQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

7.49

-7.48

Drawdowns

COSW vs. ROCQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, which is greater than ROCQ's maximum drawdown of -5.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and ROCQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSWROCQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-5.15%

-11.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.62%

-0.33%

-14.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-0.66%

-3.51%

Volatility

COSW vs. ROCQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSWROCQDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.10%

16.13%

+9.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.10%

16.13%

+9.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.10%

16.13%

+9.97%

COSW vs. ROCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ROCQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

COSW vs. ROCQ - Dividend Comparison

COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.13%, more than ROCQ's 2.02% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


COSW and ROCQ have a correlation of -0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ROCQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ROCQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 2.02% for ROCQ.

COSW is categorized as Derivative Income, while ROCQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COSW and 0.35% for ROCQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSW and ROCQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer