COSW vs. LQTI
COSW (Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF) and LQTI (FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. COSW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LQTI.
Performance
COSW vs. LQTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly higher than LQTI's 0.16% return.
COSW
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQTI
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.16%
- 6M
- -0.04%
- 1Y
- 5.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COSW vs. LQTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 12.13% | -10.71% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 0.16% | -0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between COSW and LQTI is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COSW vs. LQTI — Risk / Return Rank
COSW
LQTI
COSW vs. LQTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF (LQTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COSW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 0.88 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
COSW vs. LQTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, which is greater than LQTI's maximum drawdown of -3.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and LQTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COSW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.24% | -3.41% | -12.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -1.44% | -13.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -0.88% | -3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.11% | — |
Volatility
COSW vs. LQTI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COSW | LQTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.10% | 5.10% | +21.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.10% | 5.97% | +20.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.10% | 5.97% | +20.13% |
COSW vs. LQTI - Expense Ratio Comparison
COSW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than LQTI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
COSW vs. LQTI - Dividend Comparison
COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.13%, more than LQTI's 9.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 18.13% | 4.96% |
LQTI FT Vest Investment Grade & Target Income ETF | 9.11% | 7.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COSW and LQTI have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LQTI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQTI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.
COSW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 9.11% for LQTI.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and FT Vest. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COSW and 0.65% for LQTI.
Find the right allocation for COSW and LQTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer