COSW vs. JEPQ
COSW (Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COSW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. COSW is actively managed, while JEPQ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. COSW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
COSW vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 9.54% return.
COSW
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -6.40%
- YTD
- 12.13%
- 6M
- 2.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COSW vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 12.13% | -10.71% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 9.54% | 2.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between COSW and JEPQ is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | -0.04 |
COSW vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COSW
JEPQ
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
COSW
JEPQ
Basic Materials
COSW
-
JEPQ
Communication Services
COSW
-
JEPQ
Consumer Cyclical
COSW
-
JEPQ
Energy
COSW
-
JEPQ
Financial Services
COSW
-
JEPQ
Healthcare
COSW
-
JEPQ
Industrials
COSW
-
JEPQ
Real Estate
COSW
-
JEPQ
Technology
COSW
-
JEPQ
Utilities
COSW
-
JEPQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COSW vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
COSW
JEPQ
COSW vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COSW | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.01 | 1.00 | -1.00 |
Drawdowns
COSW vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, smaller than the maximum JEPQ drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COSW | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.24% | -20.07% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -0.10% | -14.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.17% | -3.42% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.79% | — |
Volatility
COSW vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COSW | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.26% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.10% | 11.73% | +14.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.10% | 16.61% | +9.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.10% | 16.61% | +9.49% |
COSW vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
COSW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
COSW vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.13%, more than JEPQ's 10.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COSW Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF | 18.13% | 4.96% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.07% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COSW and JEPQ have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.
COSW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 10.07% for JEPQ.
COSW is categorized as Derivative Income, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COSW and 0.35% for JEPQ.
Find the right allocation for COSW and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer