PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSW vs. FTQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSW vs. FTQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 9.32% return, which is significantly lower than FTQI's 12.76% return.


COSW

1D
3.90%
1M
-5.40%
6M
-3.14%
YTD
9.32%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FTQI

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.28%
6M
11.68%
YTD
12.76%
1Y
26.34%
3Y*
16.62%
5Y*
12.26%
10Y*
7.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSW vs. FTQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
9.32%-10.48%
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
12.76%2.91%

Correlation

The correlation between COSW and FTQI is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025

-0.09

COSW vs. FTQI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COSW
FTQI

Consumer Defensive

8.5%
6.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Communication Services

-

11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.5%

Energy

-

2.3%

Financial Services

-

5.5%

Healthcare

-

6.0%

Industrials

-

4.1%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Technology

-

49.4%

Utilities

-

1.5%

Consumer Defensive

COSW
8.5%
FTQI
6.2%

Basic Materials

COSW

-

FTQI
1.4%

Communication Services

COSW

-

FTQI
11.8%

Consumer Cyclical

COSW

-

FTQI
10.5%

Energy

COSW

-

FTQI
2.3%

Financial Services

COSW

-

FTQI
5.5%

Healthcare

COSW

-

FTQI
6.0%

Industrials

COSW

-

FTQI
4.1%

Real Estate

COSW

-

FTQI
1.3%

Technology

COSW

-

FTQI
49.4%

Utilities

COSW

-

FTQI
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSW vs. FTQI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FTQI
FTQI Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FTQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQI Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQI Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSW vs. FTQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF (FTQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COSWFTQIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.07

COSW vs. FTQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COSW vs. FTQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -20.01%, roughly equal to the maximum FTQI drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and FTQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSWFTQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.01%

-19.42%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.77%

-0.85%

-15.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.99%

-3.73%

-2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

Volatility

COSW vs. FTQI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSWFTQIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.16%

10.87%

+15.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.16%

14.82%

+11.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.16%

12.98%

+13.18%

COSW vs. FTQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQI's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

COSW vs. FTQI - Dividend Comparison

COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.43%, more than FTQI's 10.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
21.43%4.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTQI
First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF
10.92%11.46%11.66%11.49%9.85%3.05%3.27%2.95%3.27%2.74%3.02%3.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSW and FTQI have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTQI is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTQI is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 21.43%, compared with 10.92% for FTQI.

COSW is categorized as Derivative Income, while FTQI is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COSW and 0.75% for FTQI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSW and FTQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer