PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COSW vs. AVGG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COSW vs. AVGG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COSW achieves a 12.13% return, which is significantly lower than AVGG's 71.17% return.


COSW

1D
0.92%
1M
-6.40%
YTD
12.13%
6M
2.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVGG

1D
-0.88%
1M
29.67%
YTD
71.17%
6M
37.06%
1Y
161.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COSW vs. AVGG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
12.13%-10.71%
AVGG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF
71.17%-5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between COSW and AVGG is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

-0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COSW vs. AVGG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COSW

AVGG
AVGG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AVGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COSW vs. AVGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF (COSW) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

COSW vs. AVGG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COSWAVGGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.01

2.52

-2.51

Drawdowns

COSW vs. AVGG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COSW drawdown since its inception was -16.24%, smaller than the maximum AVGG drawdown of -53.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COSW and AVGG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSWAVGGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-53.77%

+37.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.62%

-0.88%

-13.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.17%

-17.71%

+13.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.09%

Volatility

COSW vs. AVGG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSWAVGGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.10%

86.10%

-60.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.10%

84.79%

-58.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.10%

84.79%

-58.69%

COSW vs. AVGG - Expense Ratio Comparison

COSW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AVGG's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

COSW vs. AVGG - Dividend Comparison

COSW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.13%, more than AVGG's 1.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AVGG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF
1.32%2.26%
COSW
Roundhill COST WeeklyPay ETF
18.13%4.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


COSW and AVGG have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AVGG is cheaper at 0.76% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AVGG is cheaper with a 0.76% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for COSW.

COSW has the higher dividend yield at 18.13%, compared with 1.32% for AVGG.

COSW is categorized as Derivative Income, while AVGG is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for COSW and 0.76% for AVGG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COSW and AVGG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer