COST vs. XSB.TO
COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock, while XSB.TO (iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF) is Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD. Over the past 10 years, COST returned 22.27%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for XSB.TO. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COST vs. XSB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COST is traded in USD, while XSB.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XSB.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than XSB.TO's -0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has outperformed XSB.TO with an annualized return of 22.27%, while XSB.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.10% annualized return.
COST
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- -0.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.12%
- 5Y*
- 22.12%
- 10Y*
- 22.27%
XSB.TO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -1.11%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 0.52%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.85%
- 10Y*
- 1.10%
COST vs. XSB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 14.24% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
XSB.TO iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF | -0.83% | 8.66% | -2.39% | 7.22% | -9.76% | -1.06% | 7.75% | 7.64% | -6.28% | 7.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between COST and XSB.TO is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.04 |
The correlation between COST and XSB.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COST vs. XSB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
COST
XSB.TO
COST vs. XSB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COST | XSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.04 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 0.28 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 0.67 | -0.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COST vs. XSB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, which is greater than XSB.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and XSB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COST | XSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.39% | -28.27% | -25.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.14% | -3.40% | -11.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -7.05% | -13.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.40% | -17.85% | -13.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.40% | -18.49% | -12.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.23% | -8.46% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.36% | -11.08% | -2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.67% | 1.43% | +5.24% |
Volatility
COST vs. XSB.TO - Volatility Comparison
Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF (XSB.TO) at 1.18%. This indicates that COST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COST | XSB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 1.18% | +6.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.53% | 3.67% | +10.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.80% | 4.74% | +14.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 6.84% | +15.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 7.24% | +14.71% |
Dividends
COST vs. XSB.TO - Dividend Comparison
COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than XSB.TO's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
XSB.TO iShares Core Canadian Short Term Bond Index ETF | 3.10% | 3.15% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 2.28% | 2.05% | 2.21% | 2.39% | 2.39% | 2.36% | 2.36% | 2.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COST and XSB.TO have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for COST and XSB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer