PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
COST vs. XGD.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

COST vs. XGD.TO

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock, while XGD.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF) is Gold fund tracking the S&P/TSX Global Gold Index. Over the past 10 years, COST returned 22.27%/yr vs 13.24%/yr for XGD.TO. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

COST vs. XGD.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COST is traded in USD, while XGD.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XGD.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than XGD.TO's -4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has outperformed XGD.TO with an annualized return of 22.27%, while XGD.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.24% annualized return.

COST

1D
0.68%
1M
-6.35%
YTD
14.24%
6M
11.38%
1Y
-0.24%
3Y*
25.12%
5Y*
22.12%
10Y*
22.27%

XGD.TO

1D
2.80%
1M
-14.79%
YTD
-4.15%
6M
-2.94%
1Y
52.19%
3Y*
39.77%
5Y*
17.63%
10Y*
13.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COST vs. XGD.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation		14.24%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF		-4.15%156.14%10.29%6.44%-8.90%-5.76%24.05%46.20%-11.54%8.29%

Correlation

The correlation between COST and XGD.TO is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.06

The correlation between COST and XGD.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Costco Wholesale Corporation

iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF

Often compared with COST:
COST vs. WMTCOST vs. BRK-BCOST vs. BJCOST vs. TGTCOST vs. PGCOST vs. HDCOST vs. KO
Often compared with XGD.TO:
XGD.TO vs. CGL.TOXGD.TO vs. GLDXGD.TO vs. ZGD.TOXGD.TO vs. MNT.TOXGD.TO vs. BRK-BXGD.TO vs. ZGLD.TOXGD.TO vs. ZGLD.SW

Return for Risk

COST vs. XGD.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
XGD.TO
XGD.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGD.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COST vs. XGD.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

COSTXGD.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.08
1.26

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.02
1.68

-1.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.24

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

1.63

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.22

4.62

-4.84

COST vs. XGD.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COST Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the XGD.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COST and XGD.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COST vs. XGD.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, smaller than the maximum XGD.TO drawdown of -80.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and XGD.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

COSTXGD.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.39%

-80.30%

+26.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.14%

-34.40%

+19.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

-34.40%

+13.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.40%

-44.90%

+13.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

-47.12%

+15.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.23%

-29.14%

+18.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

-40.83%

+27.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.67%

12.14%

-5.47%

Volatility

COST vs. XGD.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is 7.44%, while iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF (XGD.TO) has a volatility of 16.18%. This indicates that COST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XGD.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

COSTXGD.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

16.18%

-8.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.53%

36.18%

-21.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.80%

44.62%

-25.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

33.65%

-10.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.95%

34.19%

-12.24%

Dividends

COST vs. XGD.TO - Dividend Comparison

COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than XGD.TO's 0.64% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation		0.55%0.59%0.49%2.87%0.76%0.54%3.38%0.86%1.08%4.81%1.09%4.06%
XGD.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Gold Index ETF		0.64%0.62%0.93%1.49%1.77%1.38%0.35%0.54%0.25%0.14%0.10%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions

COST and XGD.TO have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COST and XGD.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer