COST vs. VTIP
COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock, while VTIP (Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) is Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index. Over the past 10 years, COST returned 22.27%/yr vs 3.09%/yr for VTIP. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COST vs. VTIP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than VTIP's 1.85% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has outperformed VTIP with an annualized return of 22.27%, while VTIP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.09% annualized return.
COST
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -5.66%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- -0.24%
- 3Y*
- 25.12%
- 5Y*
- 22.12%
- 10Y*
- 22.27%
VTIP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.09%
COST vs. VTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 14.24% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.85% | 6.07% | 4.74% | 4.62% | -2.94% | 5.36% | 4.95% | 4.86% | 0.56% | 0.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between COST and VTIP is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2012 | 0.05 |
The correlation between COST and VTIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COST vs. VTIP — Risk / Return Rank
COST
VTIP
COST vs. VTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COST | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.65 | -0.65 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 6.57 | -6.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | 25.36 | -25.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COST vs. VTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, which is greater than VTIP's maximum drawdown of -6.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and VTIP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COST | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.39% | -6.27% | -47.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.14% | -0.70% | -14.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -0.98% | -19.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.40% | -5.50% | -25.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.40% | -6.27% | -25.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.23% | -0.22% | -10.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.36% | -1.04% | -12.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.67% | 0.18% | +6.49% |
Volatility
COST vs. VTIP - Volatility Comparison
Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) has a higher volatility of 7.44% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) at 0.40%. This indicates that COST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COST | VTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 0.40% | +7.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.53% | 1.04% | +13.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.80% | 1.50% | +17.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 2.77% | +19.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 2.74% | +19.21% |
Dividends
COST vs. VTIP - Dividend Comparison
COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than VTIP's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 3.59% | 3.81% | 2.70% | 2.86% | 6.84% | 4.68% | 1.20% | 1.95% | 2.45% | 1.52% | 0.76% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COST and VTIP have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COST has higher volatility (7.44%) compared to VTIP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COST dropped -53.39% vs VTIP's -6.27%.
VTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COST and VTIP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer