COST vs. UBER
COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) and UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.) are both stocks. COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive), while UBER operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, COST returned 22.05%/yr vs 7.35%/yr for UBER. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COST vs. UBER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly higher than UBER's -14.26% return.
COST
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- -3.42%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.05%
- 10Y*
- 22.25%
UBER
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- -7.14%
- YTD
- -14.26%
- 6M
- -24.32%
- 1Y
- -18.15%
- 3Y*
- 19.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- —
COST vs. UBER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 13.35% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 19.51% |
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | -14.26% | 35.46% | -2.03% | 148.97% | -41.02% | -17.78% | 71.49% | -28.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between COST and UBER is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019 | 0.21 |
The correlation between COST and UBER shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
COST:
$26.51
UBER:
$4.05
COST:
36.77
UBER:
17.28
COST:
2.88
UBER:
0.11
COST:
1.11
UBER:
2.75
COST:
$293.59B
UBER:
$53.69B
COST:
$11.12B
UBER:
$22.03B
COST:
$12.48B
UBER:
$5.85B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COST vs. UBER — Risk / Return Rank
COST
UBER
COST vs. UBER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COST | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.93 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.22 | -0.59 | +0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.51 | -1.04 | +0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COST | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 | -0.56 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.16 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.15 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
COST vs. UBER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, smaller than the maximum UBER drawdown of -68.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and UBER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COST | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.39% | -68.05% | +14.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.38% | -30.89% | +15.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -30.89% | +10.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.40% | -60.45% | +29.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.40% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.93% | -30.01% | +19.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.36% | -25.67% | +12.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.15% | 17.51% | -10.36% |
Volatility
COST vs. UBER - Volatility Comparison
Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) have volatilities of 7.71% and 7.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COST | UBER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.71% | 7.84% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.53% | 24.00% | -9.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 32.64% | -13.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.71% | 44.82% | -22.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 50.67% | -28.72% |
Dividends
COST vs. UBER - Dividend Comparison
COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, while UBER has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
COST vs. UBER - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Costco Wholesale Corporation and Uber Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COST vs. UBER - Profitability Comparison
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
UBER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
UBER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
UBER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COST and UBER have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UBER has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to COST (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COST dropped -53.39% vs UBER's -68.05%.
COST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.18 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COST and UBER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer