COST vs. TYT.L
COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) and TYT.L (Toyota Motor Corp) are both stocks. COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive), while TYT.L operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, COST returned 22.27%/yr vs 16.02%/yr for TYT.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
COST vs. TYT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COST is traded in USD, while TYT.L is traded in JPY. To make them comparable, the TYT.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than TYT.L's -17.93% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has outperformed TYT.L with an annualized return of 22.27%, while TYT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 16.02% annualized return.
COST
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 11.38%
- 1Y
- -1.48%
- 3Y*
- 25.12%
- 5Y*
- 22.12%
- 10Y*
- 22.27%
TYT.L
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -7.01%
- YTD
- -17.93%
- 6M
- -15.96%
- 1Y
- -0.90%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- 16.02%
COST vs. TYT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 14.24% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
TYT.L Toyota Motor Corp | -17.93% | 10.65% | 11.81% | 36.60% | -22.35% | 37.16% | 18.88% | 43.15% | 7.71% | 29.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between COST and TYT.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2007 | -0.03 |
Fundamentals
COST:
$26.51
TYT.L:
¥295.25
COST:
37.06
TYT.L:
9.40
COST:
2.90
TYT.L:
0.52
COST:
1.12
TYT.L:
0.71
COST:
$293.59B
TYT.L:
¥50.68T
COST:
$11.12B
TYT.L:
¥8.46T
COST:
$12.48B
TYT.L:
¥7.05T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COST vs. TYT.L — Risk / Return Rank
COST
TYT.L
COST vs. TYT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Toyota Motor Corp (TYT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COST | TYT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.02 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | -0.03 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | -0.08 | -0.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COST vs. TYT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, roughly equal to the maximum TYT.L drawdown of -55.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and TYT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COST | TYT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.39% | -55.36% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.14% | -29.47% | +14.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -38.71% | +17.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.40% | -38.71% | +7.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.40% | -38.71% | +7.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.23% | -28.87% | +18.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.36% | -14.24% | +0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.67% | 10.79% | -4.12% |
Volatility
COST vs. TYT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is 7.44%, while Toyota Motor Corp (TYT.L) has a volatility of 7.88%. This indicates that COST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TYT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COST | TYT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.44% | 7.88% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.53% | 21.32% | -6.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.80% | 31.56% | -12.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 35.83% | -13.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 32.23% | -10.28% |
Dividends
COST vs. TYT.L - Dividend Comparison
COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than TYT.L's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
TYT.L Toyota Motor Corp | 3.42% | 2.83% | 2.70% | 2.51% | 2.69% | 12.11% | 7.85% | 14.24% | 17.17% | 14.55% | 15.27% | 15.01% |
Financials
COST vs. TYT.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Costco Wholesale Corporation and Toyota Motor Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COST vs. TYT.L - Profitability Comparison
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
TYT.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corp reported a gross profit of 1.91T and revenue of 12.60T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.1%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
TYT.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corp reported an operating income of 569.50B and revenue of 12.60T, resulting in an operating margin of 4.5%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
TYT.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Toyota Motor Corp reported a net income of 817.21B and revenue of 12.60T, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COST and TYT.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for COST and TYT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer