COST vs. SOXL
COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock, while SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the ICE Semiconductor Index. Over the past 10 years, COST returned 21.83%/yr vs 65.95%/yr for SOXL. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COST vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 10.64% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 564.50% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of 21.83%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 65.95% annualized return.
COST
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- -7.47%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 11.51%
- 1Y
- -2.40%
- 3Y*
- 23.66%
- 5Y*
- 21.40%
- 10Y*
- 21.83%
SOXL
- 1D
- 19.43%
- 1M
- 56.56%
- YTD
- 564.50%
- 6M
- 569.44%
- 1Y
- 1,221.33%
- 3Y*
- 124.34%
- 5Y*
- 50.47%
- 10Y*
- 65.95%
COST vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 10.64% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 564.50% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between COST and SOXL is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010 | 0.37 |
The correlation between COST and SOXL shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COST vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
COST
SOXL
COST vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COST | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -10.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.63 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | 27.84 | -27.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | 89.88 | -90.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COST vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, smaller than the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COST | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.39% | -90.46% | +37.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.14% | -43.47% | +28.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.74% | -87.88% | +67.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.40% | -90.46% | +59.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.40% | -90.46% | +59.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.06% | -0.45% | -12.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.36% | -34.96% | +21.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.81% | 13.44% | -6.63% |
Volatility
COST vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is 6.60%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 62.74%. This indicates that COST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COST | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.60% | 62.74% | -56.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.49% | 96.77% | -82.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.93% | 114.08% | -95.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 109.76% | -87.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 100.44% | -78.48% |
Dividends
COST vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.56% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COST and SOXL have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (62.74%) compared to COST (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COST dropped -53.39% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.61 vs -0.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COST and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer