PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COST vs. ETH-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

COST vs. ETH-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Ethereum (ETH-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COST achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than ETH-USD's -43.80% return. Over the past 10 years, COST has underperformed ETH-USD with an annualized return of 22.27%, while ETH-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 56.61% annualized return.


COST

1D
0.68%
1M
-4.91%
YTD
14.24%
6M
11.38%
1Y
-1.48%
3Y*
25.12%
5Y*
22.12%
10Y*
22.27%

ETH-USD

1D
-0.28%
1M
-26.16%
YTD
-43.80%
6M
-45.95%
1Y
-36.94%
3Y*
-1.40%
5Y*
-7.86%
10Y*
56.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COST vs. ETH-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COST
Costco Wholesale Corporation
14.24%-5.39%39.62%49.00%-19.05%51.82%32.67%45.70%10.60%22.37%
ETH-USD
Ethereum
-43.80%-10.91%46.00%90.84%-67.48%398.30%473.88%-1.52%-82.39%8,984.19%

Correlation

The correlation between COST and ETH-USD is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2015

0.09

The correlation between COST and ETH-USD shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COST vs. ETH-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COST
COST Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
COST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
COST Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
COST Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
COST Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

ETH-USD
ETH-USD Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
ETH-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETH-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETH-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
ETH-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETH-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COST vs. ETH-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) and Ethereum (ETH-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COSTETH-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.95

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

-0.55

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.22

-0.94

+0.72

COST vs. ETH-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COST Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the ETH-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COST and ETH-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COST vs. ETH-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COST drawdown since its inception was -53.39%, smaller than the maximum ETH-USD drawdown of -94.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST and ETH-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COSTETH-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.39%

-94.01%

+40.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.14%

-67.53%

+52.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.74%

-67.53%

+46.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.40%

-79.35%

+47.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.40%

-94.01%

+62.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.23%

-65.49%

+55.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.36%

-50.89%

+37.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.67%

45.31%

-38.64%

Volatility

COST vs. ETH-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) is 7.44%, while Ethereum (ETH-USD) has a volatility of 17.22%. This indicates that COST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETH-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COSTETH-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.44%

17.22%

-9.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.53%

46.29%

-31.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.80%

56.20%

-37.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

59.59%

-36.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.95%

77.89%

-55.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


COST and ETH-USD have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETH-USD has higher volatility (17.22%) compared to COST (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COST dropped -53.39% vs ETH-USD's -94.01%.

COST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COST and ETH-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer