COST.L vs. XPEV
COST.L (Costain Group plc) and XPEV (XPeng Inc.) are both stocks. COST.L operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while XPEV operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, COST.L returned 29.36%/yr vs -14.53%/yr for XPEV. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
COST.L vs. XPEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COST.L is traded in GBp, while XPEV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XPEV values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COST.L achieves a 24.11% return, which is significantly higher than XPEV's -20.56% return.
COST.L
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 24.11%
- 6M
- 27.63%
- 1Y
- 64.44%
- 3Y*
- 57.71%
- 5Y*
- 29.36%
- 10Y*
- -4.19%
XPEV
- 1D
- -4.52%
- 1M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- -20.56%
- 6M
- -20.30%
- 1Y
- -18.77%
- 3Y*
- 19.74%
- 5Y*
- -14.53%
- 10Y*
- —
COST.L vs. XPEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST.L Costain Group plc | 24.11% | 54.64% | 69.69% | 62.13% | -26.26% | -9.80% | 7.83% |
XPEV XPeng Inc. | -20.56% | 59.35% | -17.57% | 39.44% | -77.90% | 18.62% | 95.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between COST.L and XPEV is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2020 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
COST.L:
£537.62M
XPEV:
$7.62B
COST.L:
£0.25
XPEV:
-$3.15
COST.L:
0.23
XPEV:
0.16
COST.L:
2.08
XPEV:
0.27
COST.L:
£2.30B
XPEV:
$73.56B
COST.L:
£216.60M
XPEV:
$14.61B
COST.L:
£110.20M
XPEV:
-$3.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COST.L vs. XPEV — Risk / Return Rank
COST.L
XPEV
COST.L vs. XPEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Costain Group plc (COST.L) and XPeng Inc. (XPEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COST.L | XPEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.98 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | -0.39 | +2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.31 | -0.67 | +6.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COST.L | XPEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | -0.34 | +2.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | -0.19 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | -0.06 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
COST.L vs. XPEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COST.L drawdown since its inception was -92.88%, roughly equal to the maximum XPEV drawdown of -90.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COST.L and XPEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COST.L | XPEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.88% | -90.41% | -2.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.66% | -47.77% | +22.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -71.48% | +45.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.34% | -87.44% | +39.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.68% | -77.93% | +23.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -67.43% | +18.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.09% | 28.02% | -17.93% |
Volatility
COST.L vs. XPEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Costain Group plc (COST.L) is 7.69%, while XPeng Inc. (XPEV) has a volatility of 13.83%. This indicates that COST.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COST.L | XPEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.69% | 13.83% | -6.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.96% | 34.90% | -8.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.31% | 54.84% | -17.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.85% | 77.36% | -36.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.90% | 82.14% | -29.24% |
Dividends
COST.L vs. XPEV - Dividend Comparison
COST.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, while XPEV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST.L Costain Group plc | 2.16% | 1.88% | 1.13% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.15% | 4.30% | 2.65% | 3.07% | 2.52% |
XPEV XPeng Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
COST.L vs. XPEV - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Costain Group plc and XPeng Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
COST.L vs. XPEV - Profitability Comparison
COST.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costain Group plc reported a gross profit of 61.40M and revenue of 520.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.8%.
XPEV - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPeng Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.67B and revenue of 12.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.6%.
COST.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costain Group plc reported an operating income of 30.50M and revenue of 520.30M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.9%.
XPEV - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPeng Inc. reported an operating income of -2.10B and revenue of 12.95B, resulting in an operating margin of -16.2%.
COST.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costain Group plc reported a net income of 23.10M and revenue of 520.30M, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
XPEV - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, XPeng Inc. reported a net income of -1.77B and revenue of 12.95B, resulting in a net margin of -13.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
COST.L and XPEV have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for COST.L and XPEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer