PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CORP.L vs. ISAC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CORP.L vs. ISAC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CORP.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CORP.L achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly lower than ISAC.L's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CORP.L has underperformed ISAC.L with an annualized return of 1.94%, while ISAC.L has yielded a comparatively higher 12.44% annualized return.


CORP.L

1D
0.10%
1M
-0.86%
6M
-0.48%
YTD
-0.49%
1Y
3.35%
3Y*
5.03%
5Y*
-0.16%
10Y*
1.94%

ISAC.L

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.60%
6M
9.67%
YTD
11.18%
1Y
23.73%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
12.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CORP.L vs. ISAC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CORP.L
iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
-0.49%9.82%1.37%8.71%-16.01%-3.28%9.89%11.61%-3.91%8.76%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
11.18%22.36%17.81%22.57%-18.16%18.85%15.66%25.75%-9.73%24.40%

Correlation

The correlation between CORP.L and ISAC.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2012

0.23

Over the past year, CORP.L and ISAC.L have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.23, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CORP.L vs. ISAC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CORP.L
CORP.L Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
CORP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CORP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
CORP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CORP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CORP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

ISAC.L
ISAC.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CORP.L vs. ISAC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CORP.L) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CORP.LISAC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.34

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.89

2.70

-1.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.45

10.76

-8.30

CORP.L vs. ISAC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CORP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.65, which is lower than the ISAC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CORP.L and ISAC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CORP.L vs. ISAC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CORP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.09%, smaller than the maximum ISAC.L drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORP.L and ISAC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CORP.LISAC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.09%

-33.82%

+8.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.55%

-8.77%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.07%

-16.56%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.80%

-26.07%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.09%

-33.82%

+8.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.23%

-1.03%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.15%

-4.62%

-0.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.29%

2.20%

-0.91%

Volatility

CORP.L vs. ISAC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CORP.L) is 1.01%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAC.L) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that CORP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISAC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CORP.LISAC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

3.18%

-2.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.85%

10.57%

-6.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.91%

12.88%

-7.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.98%

15.65%

-8.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.72%

15.82%

-9.10%

CORP.L vs. ISAC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CORP.L and ISAC.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CORP.L vs. ISAC.L - Dividend Comparison

CORP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, while ISAC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CORP.L
iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.27%4.05%3.98%3.22%2.60%2.13%2.28%2.67%2.71%2.48%2.73%2.68%
ISAC.L
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CORP.L and ISAC.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CORP.L and ISAC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

CORP.L is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while ISAC.L is Global Equities. CORP.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate Index (USD), while ISAC.L tracks MSCI All Country World Index (Net).

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CORP.L and ISAC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer