CORO vs. BDGS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CORO (iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CORO returned 32.14% vs 10.14% for BDGS. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CORO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

CORO vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF (CORO) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CORO achieves a 15.71% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 4.35% return.

CORO

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -0.67%
• 6M: 9.04%
• YTD: 15.71%
• 1Y: 32.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 28.17%

BDGS

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -0.71%
• 6M: 4.08%
• YTD: 4.35%
• 1Y: 10.14%
• 3Y*: 13.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	$35.83K	$93.96K	$183.58K
CORO iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF	$23.60M	$28.41M	$88.35M

CORO vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
CORO iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF	15.71%	35.09%	-3.56%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	4.35%	10.61%	0.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CORO and BDGS is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.61

The correlation between CORO and BDGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

CORO vs. BDGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CORO	BDGS
Financial Services	25.2%	9.3%
Technology	22.1%	38.9%
Industrials	15.0%	6.8%
Healthcare	6.3%	7.1%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	12.2%
Basic Materials	5.0%	1.3%
Energy	4.8%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.6%	3.6%
Utilities	3.8%	1.8%
Communication Services	3.6%	15.1%
Real Estate	1.9%	1.5%

Return for Risk

CORO vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CORO

CORO Risk / Return Rank: 79
CORO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
CORO Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
CORO Omega Ratio Rank: 80
CORO Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
CORO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 64
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CORO vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF (CORO) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CORO	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.83	1.38	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	2.12	+0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.28	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	2.04	+0.78
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.33	8.70	+1.63

CORO vs. BDGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CORO Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CORO and BDGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CORO vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CORO drawdown since its inception was -14.13%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CORO and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	CORO	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.13%	-9.12%	-5.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.25%	-4.76%	-6.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.65%	-2.03%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.86%	-0.69%	-1.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	1.12%	+1.95%

Volatility

CORO vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF (CORO) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 3.21%. This indicates that CORO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CORO	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	3.21%	+2.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.56%	6.11%	+9.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.41%	7.06%	+10.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.35%	8.30%	+9.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	8.30%	+9.05%

CORO vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CORO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

CORO vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

CORO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, more than BDGS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.53%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
CORO iShares International Country Rotation Active ETF	2.84%	3.20%	1.53%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CORO and BDGS in my portfolio?

CORO and BDGS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CORO or BDGS?

CORO has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to BDGS (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CORO dropped -14.13% vs BDGS's -9.12%.

Which ETF is better, CORO or BDGS?

On 1-year performance, CORO leads with 32.14% vs 10.14% for BDGS. On fees, CORO is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, BDGS has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CORO or BDGS?

Over the 1-year period, CORO has performed better with a 32.14% return vs 10.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CORO or BDGS?

CORO is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CORO or BDGS?

CORO has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.53% for BDGS.

What is the main difference between CORO and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for CORO and 0.87% for BDGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CORO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.