PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COR.LS vs. MC.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

COR.LS vs. MC.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Corticeira Amorim (COR.LS) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COR.LS achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly higher than MC.PA's -25.30% return. Over the past 10 years, COR.LS has underperformed MC.PA with an annualized return of 1.67%, while MC.PA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.58% annualized return.


COR.LS

1D
-0.31%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
1.62%
6M
2.40%
1Y
-13.55%
3Y*
-9.13%
5Y*
-5.69%
10Y*
1.67%

MC.PA

1D
2.88%
1M
5.13%
YTD
-25.30%
6M
-23.89%
1Y
1.96%
3Y*
-14.61%
5Y*
-4.31%
10Y*
14.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COR.LS vs. MC.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COR.LS
Corticeira Amorim
1.62%-14.57%-9.07%7.89%-20.34%-0.22%4.59%28.75%-10.30%24.19%
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
-25.30%3.93%-11.73%9.60%-4.76%43.83%24.66%63.17%7.31%37.90%

Correlation

The correlation between COR.LS and MC.PA is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 1996

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COR.LS vs. MC.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COR.LS
COR.LS Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
COR.LS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COR.LS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
COR.LS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
COR.LS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
COR.LS Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

MC.PA
MC.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
MC.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MC.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MC.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
MC.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MC.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COR.LS vs. MC.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Corticeira Amorim (COR.LS) and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COR.LSMC.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.04

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.55

0.06

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.89

0.13

-1.02

COR.LS vs. MC.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COR.LS Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the MC.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COR.LS and MC.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COR.LSMC.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.73

0.06

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.30

-0.14

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

0.51

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.41

-0.07

Drawdowns

COR.LS vs. MC.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COR.LS drawdown since its inception was -75.59%, which is greater than MC.PA's maximum drawdown of -70.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COR.LS and MC.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COR.LSMC.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.59%

-70.25%

-5.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.57%

-30.65%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.78%

-48.87%

+13.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.04%

-49.03%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.04%

-49.03%

+4.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.07%

-43.38%

+4.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.68%

-16.36%

-14.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.07%

15.17%

-0.10%

Volatility

COR.LS vs. MC.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Corticeira Amorim (COR.LS) is 4.11%, while LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne (MC.PA) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that COR.LS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MC.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COR.LSMC.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

8.66%

-4.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.93%

21.08%

-8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.43%

31.02%

-12.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.66%

29.86%

-11.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.87%

27.94%

-6.07%

Dividends

COR.LS vs. MC.PA - Dividend Comparison

COR.LS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than MC.PA's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COR.LS
Corticeira Amorim
5.49%4.84%3.60%3.17%3.33%2.39%1.59%2.39%3.00%2.52%2.82%6.47%
MC.PA
LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne
2.74%2.02%2.05%1.70%1.76%0.96%0.90%1.50%2.09%1.71%1.98%2.28%

Financials

COR.LS vs. MC.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Corticeira Amorim and LVMH Moët Hennessy - Louis Vuitton, Société Européenne. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in EUR except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


COR.LS and MC.PA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COR.LS and MC.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer