COPZ vs. CPER
COPZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF) and CPER (United States Copper Index Fund) are both Copper funds. COPZ is actively managed, while CPER is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. COPZ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for CPER.
Performance
COPZ vs. CPER - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
COPZ
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CPER
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 11.16%
- 6M
- 15.65%
- 1Y
- 28.29%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
COPZ vs. CPER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
COPZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF | -17.41% |
CPER United States Copper Index Fund | 11.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPZ and CPER is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPZ vs. CPER — Risk / Return Rank
COPZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CPER
COPZ vs. CPER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long Copper ETF (COPZ) and United States Copper Index Fund (CPER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPZ | CPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.14 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPZ vs. CPER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPZ drawdown since its inception was -49.79%, smaller than the maximum CPER drawdown of -54.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPZ and CPER.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPZ | CPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.79% | -54.04% | +4.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.76% | -4.29% | -27.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.67% | -25.33% | -3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.96% | — |
Volatility
COPZ vs. CPER - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPZ | CPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.28% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 110.12% | 34.86% | +75.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 110.12% | 27.01% | +83.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 110.12% | 24.08% | +86.04% |
COPZ vs. CPER - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPZ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than CPER's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPZ vs. CPER - Dividend Comparison
Neither COPZ nor CPER has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COPZ and CPER have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, COPZ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COPZ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.06% for CPER.
COPZ and CPER have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for COPZ and 1.06% for CPER.
Find the right allocation for COPZ and CPER
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer