COPX vs. USO
COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) and USO (United States Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - COPX is a Materials fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while USO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, COPX returned 21.46%/yr vs 3.57%/yr for USO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for USO.
Performance
COPX vs. USO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 25.67% return, which is significantly lower than USO's 97.72% return. Over the past 10 years, COPX has outperformed USO with an annualized return of 21.46%, while USO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.57% annualized return.
COPX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 25.67%
- 6M
- 37.40%
- 1Y
- 118.00%
- 3Y*
- 37.98%
- 5Y*
- 19.86%
- 10Y*
- 21.46%
USO
- 1D
- -2.92%
- 1M
- -5.15%
- YTD
- 97.72%
- 6M
- 91.54%
- 1Y
- 97.20%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 23.67%
- 10Y*
- 3.57%
COPX vs. USO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.67% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 97.72% | -8.46% | 13.35% | -4.94% | 28.97% | 64.68% | -67.79% | 32.61% | -19.57% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPX and USO is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2010 | 0.35 |
The correlation between COPX and USO shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPX vs. USO — Risk / Return Rank
COPX
USO
COPX vs. USO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.37 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.27 | 4.79 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.66 | 9.00 | +4.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 2.21 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.66 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.09 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | -0.18 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
COPX vs. USO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, smaller than the maximum USO drawdown of -98.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and USO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -98.19% | +15.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.82% | -20.39% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.72% | -26.05% | -13.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.12% | -36.23% | -5.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.41% | -86.75% | +21.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.73% | -85.45% | +79.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.29% | -75.30% | +36.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.67% | 10.84% | -2.17% |
Volatility
COPX vs. USO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and United States Oil Fund LP (USO) have volatilities of 15.34% and 14.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPX | USO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.34% | 14.97% | +0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.68% | 38.35% | -2.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.41% | 44.32% | -2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.50% | 36.09% | +0.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.54% | 39.00% | -3.46% |
COPX vs. USO - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than USO's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPX vs. USO - Dividend Comparison
COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while USO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.13% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
USO United States Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPX and USO have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (15.34%) compared to USO (14.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPX dropped -83.16% vs USO's -98.19%.
On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 21.46% vs 3.57% for USO. On fees, COPX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, USO has been the lower-risk option at 14.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 21.46% return vs 3.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COPX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for USO.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for USO.
COPX is categorized as Materials, while USO is Oil & Gas. COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while USO tracks Front Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Global X and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.86% for USO.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COPX and USO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer