COPX vs. SPMO
COPX (Global X Copper Miners ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPX is a Copper fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, COPX returned 21.97%/yr vs 21.24%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPX charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
COPX vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 25.10% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 32.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with COPX having a 21.97% annualized return and SPMO not far behind at 21.24%.
COPX
- 1D
- 4.47%
- 1M
- 8.14%
- YTD
- 25.10%
- 6M
- 33.68%
- 1Y
- 115.49%
- 3Y*
- 34.51%
- 5Y*
- 22.46%
- 10Y*
- 21.97%
SPMO
- 1D
- 3.52%
- 1M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 32.66%
- 6M
- 33.70%
- 1Y
- 50.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.16%
- 5Y*
- 24.34%
- 10Y*
- 21.24%
COPX vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 25.10% | 93.50% | 3.57% | 8.38% | -0.76% | 23.39% | 51.66% | 12.48% | -31.31% | 38.92% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 32.66% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPX and SPMO is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.42 |
The correlation between COPX and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
COPX vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COPX
SPMO
Basic Materials
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
COPX
SPMO
Industrials
COPX
SPMO
Communication Services
COPX
-
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
COPX
-
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
COPX
-
SPMO
Energy
COPX
-
SPMO
Financial Services
COPX
-
SPMO
Healthcare
COPX
-
SPMO
Real Estate
COPX
-
SPMO
Technology
COPX
-
SPMO
Utilities
COPX
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPX vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
COPX
SPMO
COPX vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| COPX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.46 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.18 | 3.96 | +0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.90 | 14.96 | -2.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
COPX vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.16% | -30.95% | -52.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.82% | -12.70% | -15.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.72% | -20.13% | -19.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.12% | -22.74% | -19.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.41% | -30.95% | -34.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.15% | 0.00% | -6.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.27% | -4.60% | -34.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.98% | 3.35% | +5.63% |
Volatility
COPX vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 19.66% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.78%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPX | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.66% | 10.78% | +8.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.37% | 17.04% | +21.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.92% | 19.78% | +24.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 37.00% | 19.71% | +17.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.76% | 20.52% | +15.24% |
COPX vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPX vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than SPMO's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPX Global X Copper Miners ETF | 2.14% | 2.68% | 1.80% | 2.39% | 3.14% | 1.48% | 1.30% | 1.37% | 2.59% | 1.57% | 0.60% | 1.20% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.64% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPX and SPMO have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COPX has higher volatility (19.66%) compared to SPMO (10.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPX dropped -83.16% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 10-year performance, COPX leads with 21.97% vs 21.24% for SPMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, SPMO has been the lower-risk option at 10.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, COPX has performed better with a 21.97% return vs 21.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.
COPX has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.64% for SPMO.
COPX is categorized as Copper, while SPMO is Momentum. COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.13% for SPMO.
COPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COPX and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer