PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPX vs. CMU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPX vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

COPX is traded in USD, while CMU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CMU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPX achieves a 3.23% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.26% return. Over the past 10 years, COPX has outperformed CMU.L with an annualized return of 18.38%, while CMU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.39% annualized return.


COPX

1D
0.70%
1M
-13.30%
6M
-8.24%
YTD
3.23%
1Y
72.90%
3Y*
26.21%
5Y*
18.50%
10Y*
18.38%
ALL TIME*
5.35%

CMU.L

1D
-0.03%
1M
-2.03%
6M
15.02%
YTD
15.26%
1Y
26.35%
3Y*
16.52%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
10.39%
ALL TIME*
6.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPX vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
3.23%93.50%3.57%8.38%-0.76%23.39%51.66%12.48%-31.31%38.92%
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
15.26%35.19%-0.27%20.43%-15.42%12.00%7.79%23.82%-16.57%28.37%

Correlation

The correlation between COPX and CMU.L is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2011

0.53

The correlation between COPX and CMU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

COPX vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
COPX
CMU.L

Basic Materials

96.9%
3.5%

Industrials

3.1%
16.7%

Communication Services

-

2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.1%

Energy

-

0.0%

Financial Services

-

28.4%

Healthcare

-

4.5%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

-

20.7%

Utilities

-

6.4%

Basic Materials

COPX
96.9%
CMU.L
3.5%

Industrials

COPX
3.1%
CMU.L
16.7%

Communication Services

COPX

-

CMU.L
2.2%

Consumer Cyclical

COPX

-

CMU.L
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

COPX

-

CMU.L
6.1%

Energy

COPX

-

CMU.L
0.0%

Financial Services

COPX

-

CMU.L
28.4%

Healthcare

COPX

-

CMU.L
4.5%

Real Estate

COPX

-

CMU.L
1.0%

Technology

COPX

-

CMU.L
20.7%

Utilities

COPX

-

CMU.L
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPX vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPX
COPX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
COPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
COPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPX vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COPXCMU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.05

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.88

7.70

-0.82

COPX vs. CMU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the CMU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPX and CMU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COPX vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPX drawdown since its inception was -83.16%, which is greater than CMU.L's maximum drawdown of -40.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPX and CMU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPXCMU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.16%

-40.93%

-42.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.82%

-12.77%

-15.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.72%

-13.90%

-25.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.12%

-35.44%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-65.41%

-40.93%

-24.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.56%

-2.84%

-19.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-39.16%

-10.13%

-29.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.63%

3.41%

+7.22%

Volatility

COPX vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison

Global X Copper Miners ETF (COPX) has a higher volatility of 13.65% compared to Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) at 4.07%. This indicates that COPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPXCMU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.65%

4.07%

+9.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.63%

14.23%

+25.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.47%

16.83%

+28.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.21%

19.27%

+17.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.81%

18.86%

+16.95%

COPX vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

COPX vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison

COPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, while CMU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
2.61%2.68%1.80%2.39%3.14%1.48%1.30%1.37%2.59%1.57%0.60%1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


COPX and CMU.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPX.

COPX is categorized as Copper, while CMU.L is Europe Equities. COPX tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPX and 0.15% for CMU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPX and CMU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer