COPP vs. SPPP

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

COPP (Sprott Copper Miners ETF) and SPPP (Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - COPP is a Copper fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index, while SPPP is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by Sprott. COPP is passively managed, while SPPP is actively managed. Over the past year, COPP returned 82.28% vs 11.19% for SPPP. Their 0.59 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. COPP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for SPPP.

Performance

COPP vs. SPPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPP achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly higher than SPPP's -20.37% return.

COPP

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: 1.53%
• 6M: -3.95%
• YTD: 10.34%
• 1Y: 82.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 33.52%

SPPP

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: 2.92%
• 6M: -23.46%
• YTD: -20.37%
• 1Y: 11.19%
• 3Y*: 6.70%
• 5Y*: -5.73%
• 10Y*: 5.20%
• ALL TIME*: 2.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF	$2.68M	$3.51M	$5.40M
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust	$7.18M	$7.41M	$7.46M

COPP vs. SPPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF	10.34%	74.02%	4.25%
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust	-20.37%	89.43%	-2.84%

Correlation

The correlation between COPP and SPPP is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2024	0.59

The correlation between COPP and SPPP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

COPP vs. SPPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COPP

COPP Risk / Return Rank: 72
COPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
COPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
COPP Omega Ratio Rank: 67
COPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
COPP Martin Ratio Rank: 66

SPPP

SPPP Risk / Return Rank: 17
SPPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
SPPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
SPPP Omega Ratio Rank: 21
SPPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
SPPP Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COPP vs. SPPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COPP	SPPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	0.25	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	0.66	+1.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.09	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	0.27	+2.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.98	0.52	+7.46

COPP vs. SPPP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the SPPP Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPP and SPPP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

COPP vs. SPPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPP drawdown since its inception was -44.37%, smaller than the maximum SPPP drawdown of -59.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPP and SPPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPP	SPPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.37%	-59.09%	+14.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.91%	-45.66%	+16.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-45.66%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-58.50%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.95%	-40.61%	+24.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.06%	-26.65%	+12.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.21%	23.99%	-13.78%

Volatility

COPP vs. SPPP - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) at 10.26%. This indicates that COPP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPPP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COPP	SPPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.99%	10.26%	+2.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.81%	39.09%	+0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.99%	51.22%	-5.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.68%	35.26%	+6.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.68%	33.39%	+8.29%

COPP vs. SPPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SPPP's 0.73% expense ratio.

Dividends

COPP vs. SPPP - Dividend Comparison

COPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, while SPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF	2.14%	2.37%	2.59%
SPPP Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COPP and SPPP in my portfolio?

COPP and SPPP have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, COPP or SPPP?

COPP has higher volatility (12.99%) compared to SPPP (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPP dropped -44.37% vs SPPP's -59.09%.

Which ETF is better, COPP or SPPP?

On 1-year performance, COPP leads with 82.28% vs 11.19% for SPPP. On fees, COPP is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SPPP has been the lower-risk option at 10.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, COPP or SPPP?

Over the 1-year period, COPP has performed better with a 82.28% return vs 11.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, COPP or SPPP?

COPP is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for SPPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COPP or SPPP?

COPP has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 0.00% for SPPP.

What is the main difference between COPP and SPPP?

COPP is categorized as Copper, while SPPP is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPP and 0.73% for SPPP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

COPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.