COPP vs. PSLV
COPP (Sprott Copper Miners ETF) and PSLV (Sprott Physical Silver Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - COPP is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index, while PSLV is a Silver fund tracking the No Index (Physical Silver). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, COPP returned 111.49% vs 100.09% for PSLV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COPP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for PSLV.
Performance
COPP vs. PSLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPP achieves a 26.69% return, which is significantly higher than PSLV's -1.78% return.
COPP
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- 22.98%
- YTD
- 26.69%
- 6M
- 39.51%
- 1Y
- 111.49%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSLV
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- 100.09%
- 3Y*
- 41.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.97%
COPP vs. PSLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF | 26.69% | 74.02% | 4.18% |
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | -1.78% | 145.08% | 19.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPP and PSLV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between COPP and PSLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPP vs. PSLV — Risk / Return Rank
COPP
PSLV
COPP vs. PSLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) and Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPP | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.32 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 2.48 | +1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.39 | 5.50 | +7.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPP | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 1.72 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.11 | 0.17 | +0.94 |
Drawdowns
COPP vs. PSLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPP drawdown since its inception was -44.37%, smaller than the maximum PSLV drawdown of -79.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPP and PSLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPP | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.37% | -79.38% | +35.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.91% | -40.65% | +11.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.50% | -36.11% | +32.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.02% | -58.15% | +44.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.35% | 18.25% | -9.90% |
Volatility
COPP vs. PSLV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sprott Copper Miners ETF (COPP) is 15.22%, while Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a volatility of 16.57%. This indicates that COPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPP | PSLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.22% | 16.57% | -1.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.30% | 57.35% | -21.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.84% | 58.49% | -15.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.80% | 35.64% | +5.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.80% | 31.14% | +9.66% |
COPP vs. PSLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PSLV's 0.51% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPP vs. PSLV - Dividend Comparison
COPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, while PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
COPP Sprott Copper Miners ETF | 1.87% | 2.37% | 2.59% |
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COPP and PSLV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSLV has higher volatility (16.57%) compared to COPP (15.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPP dropped -44.37% vs PSLV's -79.38%.
On 1-year performance, COPP leads with 111.49% vs 100.09% for PSLV. On fees, PSLV is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, COPP has been the lower-risk option at 15.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COPP has performed better with a 111.49% return vs 100.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSLV is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPP.
COPP has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 0.00% for PSLV.
COPP is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while PSLV is Silver. COPP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Copper Miners Index, while PSLV tracks No Index (Physical Silver). Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPP and 0.51% for PSLV.
COPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COPP and PSLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer