COPM.AS vs. LOGS.DE

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

COPM.AS (iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF) and LOGS.DE (Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - COPM.AS is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the STOXX Global Copper Miners Index, while LOGS.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, COPM.AS returned 110.00% vs 68.17% for LOGS.DE. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPM.AS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LOGS.DE.

Performance

COPM.AS vs. LOGS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

COPM.AS is traded in USD, while LOGS.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LOGS.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPM.AS achieves a 27.79% return, which is significantly lower than LOGS.DE's 30.93% return.

COPM.AS

• 1D: -2.44%
• 1M: 16.46%
• YTD: 27.79%
• 6M: 38.45%
• 1Y: 110.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LOGS.DE

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: -3.91%
• YTD: 30.93%
• 6M: 32.03%
• 1Y: 68.17%
• 3Y*: 28.23%
• 5Y*: 20.56%
• 10Y*: 12.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPM.AS vs. LOGS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
COPM.AS iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF	27.79%	82.17%	0.45%	4.71%
LOGS.DE Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc	30.93%	63.12%	-7.67%	7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between COPM.AS and LOGS.DE is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2023	0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between COPM.AS and LOGS.DE has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

COPM.AS vs. LOGS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPM.AS

COPM.AS Risk / Return Rank: 80
COPM.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
COPM.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
COPM.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 71
COPM.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
COPM.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 80

LOGS.DE

LOGS.DE Risk / Return Rank: 94
LOGS.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LOGS.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
LOGS.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LOGS.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LOGS.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPM.AS vs. LOGS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS) and Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	COPM.AS	LOGS.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	3.82	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	4.71	-1.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.62	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.32	9.80	-5.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.56	36.46	-20.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

COPM.AS vs. LOGS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPM.AS Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the LOGS.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPM.AS and LOGS.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	COPM.AS	LOGS.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91	3.82	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.87	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	0.18	+0.95

Drawdowns

COPM.AS vs. LOGS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPM.AS drawdown since its inception was -37.12%, smaller than the maximum LOGS.DE drawdown of -64.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPM.AS and LOGS.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPM.AS	LOGS.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.12%	-64.01%	+26.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.05%	-6.92%	-18.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.71%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-59.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.44%	-4.61%	+2.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.55%	-25.48%	+13.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.98%	1.86%	+5.12%

Volatility

COPM.AS vs. LOGS.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Copper Miners UCITS ETF (COPM.AS) has a higher volatility of 14.68% compared to Amundi STOXX Europe 600 Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Acc (LOGS.DE) at 6.48%. This indicates that COPM.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOGS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	COPM.AS	LOGS.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.68%	6.48%	+8.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.95%	13.88%	+18.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.22%	17.74%	+19.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.34%	23.41%	+10.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.34%	25.35%	+8.99%

COPM.AS vs. LOGS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPM.AS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than LOGS.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

COPM.AS vs. LOGS.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither COPM.AS nor LOGS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COPM.AS and LOGS.DE in my portfolio?

COPM.AS and LOGS.DE have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COPM.AS or LOGS.DE?

On fees, LOGS.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COPM.AS or LOGS.DE?

LOGS.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for COPM.AS.

What is the main difference between COPM.AS and LOGS.DE?

COPM.AS is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while LOGS.DE is Energy Equities. COPM.AS tracks STOXX Global Copper Miners Index, while LOGS.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600 Energy ESG+. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for COPM.AS and 0.30% for LOGS.DE.