PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPJ vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPJ vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPJ achieves a 15.47% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.


COPJ

1D
0.22%
1M
14.83%
YTD
15.47%
6M
29.69%
1Y
121.26%
3Y*
46.22%
5Y*
10Y*

UGA

1D
-2.73%
1M
-12.25%
YTD
70.69%
6M
59.72%
1Y
79.48%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
24.41%
10Y*
14.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPJ vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
15.47%140.63%11.07%-5.30%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
70.69%-2.00%3.77%2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between COPJ and UGA is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023

0.12

The correlation between COPJ and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPJ vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPJ
COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPJ vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COPJUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.37

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

5.37

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.02

12.86

-1.84

COPJ vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.89, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPJ and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COPJUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89

2.27

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.10

0.12

+0.98

Drawdowns

COPJ vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPJ drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPJ and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPJUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.28%

-86.59%

+54.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.28%

-14.88%

-17.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.28%

-26.68%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.73%

-14.75%

+3.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.86%

-36.76%

+24.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.05%

6.20%

+4.85%

Volatility

COPJ vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) has a higher volatility of 15.38% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 11.64%. This indicates that COPJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPJUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.38%

11.64%

+3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.19%

30.48%

+4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.15%

35.27%

+6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.76%

34.40%

+0.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.76%

37.27%

-2.51%

COPJ vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPJ has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

COPJ vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.02%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
10.02%11.57%11.64%2.48%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COPJ and UGA have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COPJ has higher volatility (15.38%) compared to UGA (11.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPJ dropped -32.28% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 3-year performance, COPJ leads with 46.22% vs 20.80% for UGA. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 11.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, COPJ has performed better with a 46.22% return vs 20.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.

COPJ has the higher dividend yield at 10.02%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

COPJ is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. COPJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for COPJ and 0.75% for UGA.

COPJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.89 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPJ and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer