PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPJ vs. GBUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPJ vs. GBUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPJ achieves a 20.64% return, which is significantly higher than GBUG's 1.33% return.


COPJ

1D
3.38%
1M
15.54%
YTD
20.64%
6M
40.03%
1Y
137.28%
3Y*
47.64%
5Y*
10Y*

GBUG

1D
1.44%
1M
1.93%
YTD
1.33%
6M
10.28%
1Y
68.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COPJ vs. GBUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
20.64%120.11%
GBUG
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF
1.33%119.00%

Correlation

The correlation between COPJ and GBUG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.58

The correlation between COPJ and GBUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPJ vs. GBUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COPJ
COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

GBUG
GBUG Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
GBUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBUG Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
GBUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COPJ vs. GBUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


COPJGBUGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.30

1.45

+1.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.38

1.84

+1.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.26

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

2.43

+1.95

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.85

6.34

+6.50

COPJ vs. GBUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.30, which is higher than the GBUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPJ and GBUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


COPJGBUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.30

1.45

+1.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.16

1.84

-0.68

Drawdowns

COPJ vs. GBUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPJ drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, roughly equal to the maximum GBUG drawdown of -32.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPJ and GBUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPJGBUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.28%

-32.10%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.28%

-32.10%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.78%

-23.90%

+16.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.86%

-7.56%

-4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.00%

12.30%

-1.30%

Volatility

COPJ vs. GBUG - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF (GBUG) have volatilities of 14.94% and 14.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPJGBUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.94%

14.95%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.86%

39.21%

-4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.90%

47.75%

-5.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.71%

47.31%

-12.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.71%

47.31%

-12.60%

COPJ vs. GBUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPJ has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than GBUG's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

COPJ vs. GBUG - Dividend Comparison

COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.59%, more than GBUG's 1.54% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
9.59%11.57%11.64%2.48%
GBUG
Sprott Active Gold & Silver Miners ETF
1.54%1.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COPJ and GBUG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GBUG has higher volatility (14.95%) compared to COPJ (14.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPJ dropped -32.28% vs GBUG's -32.10%.

On 1-year performance, COPJ leads with 137.28% vs 68.44% for GBUG. On fees, COPJ is cheaper at 0.78% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, COPJ has performed better with a 137.28% return vs 68.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COPJ is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for GBUG.

COPJ has the higher dividend yield at 9.59%, compared with 1.54% for GBUG.

COPJ is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while GBUG is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for COPJ and 0.89% for GBUG.

COPJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPJ and GBUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer