PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
COPJ vs. DZZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

COPJ vs. DZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


COPJ

1D
-0.83%
1M
-1.50%
6M
-14.72%
YTD
0.00%
1Y
79.19%
3Y*
34.70%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
30.01%

DZZ

1D
-0.55%
1M
-7.58%
6M
-52.15%
YTD
-50.53%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
-9.06%
5Y*
-6.95%
10Y*
-9.09%
ALL TIME*
-13.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.16M$2.22M$3.49M
$5.88K$5.95K$21.77K

COPJ vs. DZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
0.00%140.63%11.07%-6.47%
DZZ
DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes
-50.53%132.78%-35.06%6.28%

Correlation

The correlation between COPJ and DZZ is -0.35, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

-0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

COPJ vs. DZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COPJ
COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

DZZ
DZZ Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
DZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
DZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
DZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COPJ vs. DZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) and DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


COPJDZZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.20

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

0.02

+2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.76

0.03

+5.73

COPJ vs. DZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current COPJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the DZZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of COPJ and DZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

COPJ vs. DZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPJ drawdown since its inception was -32.28%, smaller than the maximum DZZ drawdown of -96.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPJ and DZZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


COPJDZZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.28%

-96.64%

+64.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.28%

-81.05%

+48.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.28%

-81.05%

+48.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.56%

-95.37%

+71.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.38%

-82.40%

+70.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.14%

61.82%

-47.68%

Volatility

COPJ vs. DZZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) is 12.84%, while DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes (DZZ) has a volatility of 14.44%. This indicates that COPJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


COPJDZZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.84%

14.44%

-1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.35%

52.18%

-12.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.09%

170.05%

-123.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.86%

84.19%

-48.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.86%

64.26%

-28.40%

COPJ vs. DZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPJ has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than DZZ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

COPJ vs. DZZ - Dividend Comparison

COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.57%, while DZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
11.57%11.57%11.64%2.48%
DZZ
DB Gold Double Short Exchange Traded Notes
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


COPJ and DZZ have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DZZ has higher volatility (14.44%) compared to COPJ (12.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COPJ dropped -32.28% vs DZZ's -96.64%.

On 3-year performance, COPJ leads with 34.70% vs -9.06% for DZZ. On fees, DZZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, COPJ has been the lower-risk option at 12.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, COPJ has performed better with a 34.70% return vs -9.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DZZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.

COPJ has the higher dividend yield at 11.57%, compared with 0.00% for DZZ.

COPJ is categorized as Copper, while DZZ is Leveraged Commodities. COPJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index, while DZZ tracks Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (-200%). They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for COPJ and 0.75% for DZZ.

COPJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for COPJ and DZZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer