COPG.L vs. URNP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) and HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L).
COPG.L and URNP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COPG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 22, 2021. URNP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Natural Resources TR USD. It was launched on May 3, 2022. Both COPG.L and URNP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
COPG.L vs. URNP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COPG.L vs. URNP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPG.L Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc | 9.97% | 82.05% | 3.66% | 3.03% | -0.86% |
URNP.L HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc | 24.63% | 33.02% | -12.04% | 50.65% | -9.79% |
Different Trading Currencies
COPG.L is traded in GBP, while URNP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the URNP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPG.L achieves a 9.97% return, which is significantly lower than URNP.L's 24.63% return.
COPG.L
- 1D
- 6.05%
- 1M
- -14.87%
- YTD
- 9.97%
- 6M
- 35.56%
- 1Y
- 99.44%
- 3Y*
- 26.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
URNP.L
- 1D
- 5.38%
- 1M
- -10.30%
- YTD
- 24.63%
- 6M
- 19.64%
- 1Y
- 110.95%
- 3Y*
- 31.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COPG.L vs. URNP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than URNP.L's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COPG.L vs. URNP.L — Risk / Return Rank
COPG.L
URNP.L
COPG.L vs. URNP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) and HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPG.L | URNP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.63 | 2.37 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.99 | 2.87 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.37 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 4.78 | -0.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.49 | 12.22 | +3.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPG.L | URNP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.37 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.48 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between COPG.L and URNP.L is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
COPG.L vs. URNP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither COPG.L nor URNP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
COPG.L vs. URNP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, smaller than the maximum URNP.L drawdown of -51.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPG.L and URNP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPG.L | URNP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.84% | -51.01% | +12.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.29% | -23.65% | -2.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.93% | -13.60% | -3.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.03% | -17.94% | +3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | 9.24% | -2.67% |
Volatility
COPG.L vs. URNP.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) has a higher volatility of 16.02% compared to HANetf Sprott Uranium Miners UCITS ETF Acc (URNP.L) at 13.92%. This indicates that COPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URNP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COPG.L | URNP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.02% | 13.92% | +2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.87% | 37.09% | -6.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.62% | 46.65% | -9.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.37% | 39.97% | -6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.37% | 39.97% | -6.60% |