COPG.L vs. UIFS.L
COPG.L (Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc) and UIFS.L (iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - COPG.L is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while UIFS.L is a Financials Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, COPG.L returned 34.51%/yr vs 15.44%/yr for UIFS.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. COPG.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for UIFS.L.
Performance
COPG.L vs. UIFS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
COPG.L is traded in GBP, while UIFS.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the UIFS.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPG.L achieves a 24.91% return, which is significantly higher than UIFS.L's -4.82% return.
COPG.L
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 15.82%
- YTD
- 24.91%
- 6M
- 35.76%
- 1Y
- 119.81%
- 3Y*
- 34.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UIFS.L
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -2.63%
- 1Y
- 4.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.44%
- 5Y*
- 9.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
COPG.L vs. UIFS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPG.L Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc | 24.91% | 82.05% | 3.66% | 3.03% | 14.35% | -1.92% |
UIFS.L iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -4.82% | 7.07% | 32.24% | 6.12% | -0.45% | -1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPG.L and UIFS.L is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2021 | 0.22 |
The correlation between COPG.L and UIFS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPG.L vs. UIFS.L — Risk / Return Rank
COPG.L
UIFS.L
COPG.L vs. UIFS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) and iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPG.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.07 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.53 | 0.36 | +4.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.57 | 0.83 | +13.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPG.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.14 | 0.33 | +2.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.62 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
COPG.L vs. UIFS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPG.L drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, which is greater than UIFS.L's maximum drawdown of -35.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPG.L and UIFS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPG.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.84% | -35.31% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.29% | -12.90% | -13.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.84% | -18.72% | -20.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.64% | -6.76% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.96% | -6.08% | -7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.19% | 5.53% | +2.66% |
Volatility
COPG.L vs. UIFS.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Copper Miners UCITS ETF USD Acc (COPG.L) has a higher volatility of 14.11% compared to iShares S&P 500 Financials Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (UIFS.L) at 4.41%. This indicates that COPG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UIFS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPG.L | UIFS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.11% | 4.41% | +9.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.19% | 10.58% | +21.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.96% | 13.98% | +23.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 17.54% | +16.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.82% | 20.12% | +13.70% |
COPG.L vs. UIFS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
COPG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than UIFS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
COPG.L vs. UIFS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither COPG.L nor UIFS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COPG.L and UIFS.L have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UIFS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UIFS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for COPG.L.
COPG.L is categorized as Commodity Producers Equities, while UIFS.L is Financials Equities. COPG.L tracks Solactive Global Copper Miners Total Return Index, while UIFS.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Financials Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for COPG.L and 0.15% for UIFS.L.
Find the right allocation for COPG.L and UIFS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer