DRVG.L vs. HNSS.L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) and HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L).

DRVG.L and HNSS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DRVG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Nov 16, 2021. HNSS.L is a passively managed fund by HSBC that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Global Semiconductor Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2022. Both DRVG.L and HNSS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

DRVG.L vs. HNSS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) and HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

DRVG.L vs. HNSS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing	1.88%	20.43%	-4.12%	19.60%	-20.42%
HNSS.L HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF	8.86%	45.50%	19.96%	60.90%	-19.12%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DRVG.L achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly lower than HNSS.L's 8.86% return.

DRVG.L

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: -7.42%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 8.69%
• 1Y: 40.97%
• 3Y*: 6.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HNSS.L

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -10.05%
• YTD: 8.86%
• 6M: 27.77%
• 1Y: 88.57%
• 3Y*: 34.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DRVG.L vs. HNSS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DRVG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HNSS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

DRVG.L

Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing

HNSS.L

HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

DRVG.L vs. HNSS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DRVG.L

DRVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DRVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
DRVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
DRVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
DRVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

HNSS.L

HNSS.L Risk / Return Rank: 96
HNSS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
HNSS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
HNSS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
HNSS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
HNSS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DRVG.L vs. HNSS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) and HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DRVG.L	HNSS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	2.75	-1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	3.25	-1.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.43	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	5.99	-3.33
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.92	18.90	-9.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DRVG.L vs. HNSS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the HNSS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DRVG.L and HNSS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DRVG.L	HNSS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.58	2.75	-1.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.01	0.83	-0.83

Correlation

The correlation between DRVG.L and HNSS.L is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

DRVG.L vs. HNSS.L - Dividend Comparison

DRVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, while HNSS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing	0.60%	0.94%	0.58%	0.01%	0.01%
HNSS.L HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

DRVG.L vs. HNSS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DRVG.L drawdown since its inception was -40.24%, which is greater than HNSS.L's maximum drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DRVG.L and HNSS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	DRVG.L	HNSS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.24%	-36.83%	-3.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.08%	-14.21%	-0.87%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.29%	-12.85%	+3.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.41%	-9.88%	-8.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.35%	4.50%	-0.15%

Volatility

DRVG.L vs. HNSS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) is 7.24%, while HSBC Nasdaq Global Semiconductor UCITS ETF (HNSS.L) has a volatility of 9.56%. This indicates that DRVG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HNSS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DRVG.L	HNSS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.24%	9.56%	-2.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.87%	22.85%	-6.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.94%	32.11%	-6.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.83%	29.29%	-4.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.83%	29.29%	-4.46%