COPA vs. METL

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

COPA (Themes Copper Miners ETF) and METL (Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COPA is a Copper fund tracking the BITA Global Copper Mining Select Index, while METL is a Natural Resources fund actively managed by Sprott. COPA is passively managed, while METL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. COPA charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for METL.

Performance

COPA vs. METL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Copper Miners ETF (COPA) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, COPA achieves a 11.80% return, which is significantly higher than METL's -2.40% return.

COPA

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 0.04%
• 6M: -1.55%
• YTD: 11.80%
• 1Y: 85.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 43.28%

METL

• 1D: 1.88%
• 1M: -3.82%
• 6M: -16.81%
• YTD: -2.40%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
COPA Themes Copper Miners ETF	$160.04K	$142.88K	$165.97K
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	$254.79K	$338.57K	$594.19K

COPA vs. METL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
COPA Themes Copper Miners ETF	11.80%	40.13%
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	-2.40%	28.19%

Correlation

The correlation between COPA and METL is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

COPA vs. METL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

COPA

COPA Risk / Return Rank: 72
COPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
COPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
COPA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
COPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
COPA Martin Ratio Rank: 66

METL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

COPA vs. METL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Copper Miners ETF (COPA) and Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF (METL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COPA	METL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.61	—	—

Drawdowns

COPA vs. METL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum COPA drawdown since its inception was -34.72%, which is greater than METL's maximum drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPA and METL.

Drawdown Indicators

	COPA	METL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.72%	-28.80%	-5.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.45%	-26.00%	+12.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.87%	-10.73%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.94%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COPA	METL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.64%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.18%	43.78%	-0.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.53%	43.78%	-4.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.53%	43.78%	-4.25%

COPA vs. METL - Expense Ratio Comparison

COPA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than METL's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

COPA vs. METL - Dividend Comparison

COPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than METL's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
COPA Themes Copper Miners ETF	3.81%	4.26%	1.33%
METL Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF	1.02%	0.99%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COPA and METL in my portfolio?

COPA and METL have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, COPA or METL?

On fees, COPA is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, COPA or METL?

COPA is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for METL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, COPA or METL?

COPA has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 1.02% for METL.

What is the main difference between COPA and METL?

COPA is categorized as Copper, while METL is Natural Resources. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for COPA and 0.89% for METL.