COPA.L vs. ZINC.L
COPA.L (WisdomTree Copper) and ZINC.L (WisdomTree Zinc) are both Metals funds from WisdomTree - COPA.L tracks the Bloomberg Copper Subindex while ZINC.L tracks the Bloomberg Zinc. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, COPA.L returned 10.33%/yr vs 7.37%/yr for ZINC.L. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.49% expense ratio.
Performance
COPA.L vs. ZINC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COPA.L achieves a 13.93% return, which is significantly lower than ZINC.L's 15.82% return. Over the past 10 years, COPA.L has outperformed ZINC.L with an annualized return of 10.33%, while ZINC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.37% annualized return.
COPA.L
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 9.03%
- YTD
- 13.93%
- 6M
- 21.07%
- 1Y
- 30.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.33%
ZINC.L
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 6.40%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 17.29%
- 1Y
- 38.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.86%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
COPA.L vs. ZINC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COPA.L WisdomTree Copper | 13.93% | 36.37% | 4.81% | 2.66% | -13.58% | 24.36% | 21.41% | 4.90% | -20.37% | 26.83% |
ZINC.L WisdomTree Zinc | 15.82% | 6.70% | 13.11% | -9.01% | -11.08% | 26.65% | 15.73% | -0.07% | -22.41% | 27.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between COPA.L and ZINC.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2007 | 0.57 |
The correlation between COPA.L and ZINC.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COPA.L vs. ZINC.L — Risk / Return Rank
COPA.L
ZINC.L
COPA.L vs. ZINC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L) and WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COPA.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.34 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.19 | 3.60 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.57 | 13.28 | -10.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COPA.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 2.12 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.23 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | 0.31 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | -0.03 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
COPA.L vs. ZINC.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COPA.L drawdown since its inception was -67.44%, smaller than the maximum ZINC.L drawdown of -77.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COPA.L and ZINC.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COPA.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.44% | -77.49% | +10.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.25% | -10.74% | -14.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.25% | -19.66% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.64% | -47.04% | +12.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.75% | -47.04% | +8.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.26% | -36.98% | +34.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.24% | -56.38% | +23.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.73% | 2.90% | +8.83% |
Volatility
COPA.L vs. ZINC.L - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Copper (COPA.L) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to WisdomTree Zinc (ZINC.L) at 4.90%. This indicates that COPA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZINC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COPA.L | ZINC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 4.90% | +3.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.91% | 14.12% | +4.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.17% | 18.26% | +14.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.20% | 25.18% | +1.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.28% | 23.98% | -0.70% |
COPA.L vs. ZINC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both COPA.L and ZINC.L have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Dividends
COPA.L vs. ZINC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither COPA.L nor ZINC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
COPA.L and ZINC.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.49% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
COPA.L and ZINC.L have the same expense ratio: 0.49% per year.
COPA.L tracks Bloomberg Copper Subindex, while ZINC.L tracks Bloomberg Zinc.
Find the right allocation for COPA.L and ZINC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer