CONY vs. PAPI
CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and PAPI (Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CONY returned -46.61% vs 11.91% for PAPI. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CONY charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PAPI.
Performance
CONY vs. PAPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -25.15% return, which is significantly lower than PAPI's 5.65% return.
CONY
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -13.20%
- YTD
- -25.15%
- 6M
- -28.18%
- 1Y
- -46.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAPI
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 5.65%
- 6M
- 4.69%
- 1Y
- 11.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONY vs. PAPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -25.15% | -26.34% | 23.62% | 80.14% |
PAPI Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.65% | 6.33% | 8.90% | 4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONY and PAPI is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | 0.20 |
The correlation between CONY and PAPI shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONY vs. PAPI — Risk / Return Rank
CONY
PAPI
CONY vs. PAPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CONY | PAPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.20 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 1.74 | -2.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 4.47 | -5.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CONY vs. PAPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, which is greater than PAPI's maximum drawdown of -14.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and PAPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONY | PAPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.57% | -14.27% | -49.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.39% | -6.86% | -56.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.60% | -5.20% | -52.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -2.76% | -19.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 39.56% | 2.67% | +36.89% |
Volatility
CONY vs. PAPI - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a higher volatility of 15.55% compared to Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) at 2.64%. This indicates that CONY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONY | PAPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.55% | 2.64% | +12.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.43% | 7.15% | +37.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.61% | 10.56% | +48.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.94% | 11.76% | +48.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.94% | 11.76% | +48.18% |
CONY vs. PAPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
CONY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PAPI's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
CONY vs. PAPI - Dividend Comparison
CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 200.49%, more than PAPI's 7.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 200.49% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
PAPI Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.63% | 7.59% | 7.07% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONY and PAPI have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONY has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to PAPI (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs PAPI's -14.27%.
On 1-year performance, PAPI leads with 11.91% vs -46.61% for CONY. On fees, PAPI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PAPI has been the lower-risk option at 2.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PAPI has performed better with a 11.91% return vs -46.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAPI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CONY.
CONY has the higher dividend yield at 200.49%, compared with 7.63% for PAPI.
They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CONY and 0.29% for PAPI.
PAPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CONY and PAPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer