PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CONY vs. ICOI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CONY vs. ICOI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -20.81% return, which is significantly lower than ICOI's -17.48% return.


CONY

1D
-3.59%
1M
-7.49%
YTD
-20.81%
6M
-29.16%
1Y
-36.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ICOI

1D
-4.10%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
-17.48%
6M
-25.85%
1Y
-36.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CONY vs. ICOI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CONY and ICOI is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.92

The correlation between CONY and ICOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CONY vs. ICOI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONY
CONY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

ICOI
ICOI Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
ICOI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICOI Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICOI Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
ICOI Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICOI Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONY vs. ICOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CONYICOIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

-0.75

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.69

-0.90

+0.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

0.89

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

-0.63

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.96

-1.01

+0.04

CONY vs. ICOI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONY Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is comparable to the ICOI Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONY and ICOI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CONYICOIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

-0.75

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

-0.42

+0.59

Drawdowns

CONY vs. ICOI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, which is greater than ICOI's maximum drawdown of -58.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and ICOI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CONYICOIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.57%

-58.10%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.39%

-58.10%

-5.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.14%

-52.51%

-2.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.12%

-27.33%

+5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.50%

36.31%

+1.19%

Volatility

CONY vs. ICOI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a higher volatility of 15.91% compared to Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (ICOI) at 13.27%. This indicates that CONY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ICOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CONYICOIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.91%

13.27%

+2.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.50%

34.64%

+8.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.03%

49.06%

+8.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.00%

50.20%

+9.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.00%

50.20%

+9.80%

CONY vs. ICOI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ICOI's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

CONY vs. ICOI - Dividend Comparison

CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 178.59%, less than ICOI's 318.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
178.59%192.07%155.66%16.43%
ICOI
Bitwise COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
318.18%247.40%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, CONY and ICOI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CONY has higher volatility (15.91%) compared to ICOI (13.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs ICOI's -58.10%.

On 1-year performance, ICOI leads with -36.44% vs -36.44% for CONY. On fees, ICOI is cheaper at 0.98% per year. On volatility, ICOI has been the lower-risk option at 13.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ICOI has performed better with a -36.44% return vs -36.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ICOI is cheaper with a 0.98% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CONY.

ICOI has the higher dividend yield at 318.18%, compared with 178.59% for CONY.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for CONY and 0.98% for ICOI.

CONY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.63 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CONY and ICOI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer