CONY vs. HOOY
CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) and HOOY (YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CONY returned -36.44% vs 18.70% for HOOY. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
CONY vs. HOOY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -20.81% return, which is significantly lower than HOOY's -15.84% return.
CONY
- 1D
- -3.59%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -20.81%
- 6M
- -29.16%
- 1Y
- -36.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOY
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- -15.84%
- 6M
- -22.71%
- 1Y
- 18.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONY vs. HOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | -20.81% | -11.26% |
HOOY YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF | -15.84% | 64.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONY and HOOY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2025 | 0.72 |
The correlation between CONY and HOOY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONY vs. HOOY — Risk / Return Rank
CONY
HOOY
CONY vs. HOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CONY | HOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.63 | 0.34 | -0.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.69 | 0.85 | -1.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.11 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 0.40 | -0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.96 | 0.73 | -1.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CONY | HOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | 0.34 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.67 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
CONY vs. HOOY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, which is greater than HOOY's maximum drawdown of -51.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and HOOY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONY | HOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.57% | -51.54% | -12.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -63.39% | -51.54% | -11.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.14% | -37.28% | -17.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.12% | -20.11% | -2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.50% | 28.13% | +9.37% |
Volatility
CONY vs. HOOY - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a higher volatility of 15.91% compared to YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) at 14.59%. This indicates that CONY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONY | HOOY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.91% | 14.59% | +1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.50% | 41.80% | +1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.03% | 55.12% | +2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.00% | 54.35% | +5.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 60.00% | 54.35% | +5.65% |
CONY vs. HOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CONY and HOOY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
CONY vs. HOOY - Dividend Comparison
CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 178.59%, more than HOOY's 152.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF | 178.59% | 192.07% | 155.66% | 16.43% |
HOOY YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF | 152.09% | 82.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONY and HOOY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONY has higher volatility (15.91%) compared to HOOY (14.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs HOOY's -51.54%.
On 1-year performance, HOOY leads with 18.70% vs -36.44% for CONY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, HOOY has been the lower-risk option at 14.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, HOOY has performed better with a 18.70% return vs -36.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CONY and HOOY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
CONY has the higher dividend yield at 178.59%, compared with 152.09% for HOOY.
HOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CONY and HOOY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer