PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CONY vs. HOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CONY vs. HOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONY achieves a -20.81% return, which is significantly lower than HOOY's -15.84% return.


CONY

1D
-3.59%
1M
-7.49%
YTD
-20.81%
6M
-29.16%
1Y
-36.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOOY

1D
-1.68%
1M
15.36%
YTD
-15.84%
6M
-22.71%
1Y
18.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CONY vs. HOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CONY and HOOY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2025

0.72

The correlation between CONY and HOOY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CONY vs. HOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONY
CONY Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

HOOY
HOOY Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
HOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
HOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CONY vs. HOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) and YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CONYHOOYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.63

0.34

-0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.69

0.85

-1.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.11

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.57

0.40

-0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.96

0.73

-1.69

CONY vs. HOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONY Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the HOOY Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONY and HOOY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CONYHOOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.63

0.34

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.67

-0.50

Drawdowns

CONY vs. HOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONY drawdown since its inception was -63.57%, which is greater than HOOY's maximum drawdown of -51.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONY and HOOY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CONYHOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.57%

-51.54%

-12.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.39%

-51.54%

-11.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-55.14%

-37.28%

-17.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.12%

-20.11%

-2.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

37.50%

28.13%

+9.37%

Volatility

CONY vs. HOOY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) has a higher volatility of 15.91% compared to YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF (HOOY) at 14.59%. This indicates that CONY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CONYHOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.91%

14.59%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.50%

41.80%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.03%

55.12%

+2.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.00%

54.35%

+5.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.00%

54.35%

+5.65%

CONY vs. HOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CONY and HOOY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

CONY vs. HOOY - Dividend Comparison

CONY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 178.59%, more than HOOY's 152.09% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
CONY
YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
178.59%192.07%155.66%16.43%
HOOY
YieldMax HOOD Option Income Strategy ETF
152.09%82.87%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CONY and HOOY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CONY has higher volatility (15.91%) compared to HOOY (14.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONY dropped -63.57% vs HOOY's -51.54%.

On 1-year performance, HOOY leads with 18.70% vs -36.44% for CONY. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, HOOY has been the lower-risk option at 14.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HOOY has performed better with a 18.70% return vs -36.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CONY and HOOY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 178.59%, compared with 152.09% for HOOY.

HOOY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CONY and HOOY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer