CONX vs. NUGT
CONX (Direxion Daily COIN Bull 2X ETF) and NUGT (Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CONX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while NUGT is a Gold fund tracking the MarketVector Global Gold Miners Index (200%). CONX is actively managed, while NUGT is passively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CONX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for NUGT.
Performance
CONX vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONX achieves a -65.25% return, which is significantly lower than NUGT's -43.28% return.
CONX
- 1D
- -8.01%
- 1M
- -13.57%
- 6M
- -68.32%
- YTD
- -65.25%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUGT
- 1D
- -7.01%
- 1M
- -34.26%
- 6M
- -55.58%
- YTD
- -43.28%
- 1Y
- 42.42%
- 3Y*
- 40.37%
- 5Y*
- 13.60%
- 10Y*
- -15.94%
CONX vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CONX Direxion Daily COIN Bull 2X ETF | -65.25% | -21.90% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | -43.28% | 26.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONX and NUGT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONX vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank
CONX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NUGT
CONX vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily COIN Bull 2X ETF (CONX) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CONX | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.64 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CONX vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONX drawdown since its inception was -81.70%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONX and NUGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONX | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.70% | -99.97% | +18.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -66.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -66.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -96.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.36% | -99.87% | +22.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.59% | -91.56% | +37.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.85% | — |
Volatility
CONX vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONX | NUGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 23.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 80.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 141.97% | 95.33% | +46.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 141.97% | 73.34% | +68.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 141.97% | 87.69% | +54.28% |
CONX vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
CONX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
CONX vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison
CONX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than NUGT's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CONX Direxion Daily COIN Bull 2X ETF | 2.87% | 0.42% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUGT Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF | 0.69% | 0.22% | 1.79% | 1.67% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.63% | 0.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONX and NUGT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CONX is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CONX is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.
CONX has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 0.69% for NUGT.
CONX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NUGT is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for CONX and 1.13% for NUGT.
Find the right allocation for CONX and NUGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer