PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CONL vs. TQQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CONLTQQQ
YTD Return74.56%48.06%
1Y Return306.35%74.81%
Sharpe Ratio1.791.45
Sortino Ratio2.821.92
Omega Ratio1.321.26
Calmar Ratio3.761.47
Martin Ratio6.626.04
Ulcer Index45.10%12.43%
Daily Std Dev167.04%51.88%
Max Drawdown-82.62%-81.66%
Current Drawdown-30.61%-13.36%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CONL and TQQQ is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CONL vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CONL achieves a 74.56% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's 48.06% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
181.18%
127.50%
CONL
TQQQ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CONL vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


CONL
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
Expense ratio chart for CONL: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%
Expense ratio chart for TQQQ: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CONL vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CONL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CONL, currently valued at 1.79, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CONL, currently valued at 2.82, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.002.82
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CONL, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CONL, currently valued at 3.76, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.76
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CONL, currently valued at 6.62, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.006.62
TQQQ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TQQQ, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.45
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TQQQ, currently valued at 1.92, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.92
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TQQQ, currently valued at 1.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.26
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TQQQ, currently valued at 2.01, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TQQQ, currently valued at 6.04, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.006.04

CONL vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONL Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONL and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.005.006.007.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.79
1.45
CONL
TQQQ

Dividends

CONL vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

CONL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than TQQQ's 1.28% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CONL
GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF
0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
1.28%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.03%

Drawdowns

CONL vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -82.62%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and TQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-30.61%
-12.27%
CONL
TQQQ

Volatility

CONL vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a higher volatility of 82.00% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 16.89%. This indicates that CONL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
82.00%
16.89%
CONL
TQQQ