CONL vs. TQQQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CONL is actively managed, while TQQQ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CONL returned -35.39%/yr vs 43.81%/yr for TQQQ. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CONL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.

Performance

CONL vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONL achieves a -72.70% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 23.06% return.

CONL

• 1D: -21.10%
• 1M: -25.93%
• 6M: -61.90%
• YTD: -72.70%
• 1Y: -88.50%
• 3Y*: -35.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -35.80%

TQQQ

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: -11.90%
• 6M: 20.14%
• YTD: 23.06%
• 1Y: 56.87%
• 3Y*: 43.81%
• 5Y*: 15.36%
• 10Y*: 39.46%
• ALL TIME*: 42.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	$93.31M	$92.00M	$129.00M
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	$4.37B	$4.57B	$5.33B

CONL vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-72.70%	-58.49%	4.23%	641.63%	-80.40%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	23.06%	34.35%	58.27%	198.04%	-50.22%

Correlation

The correlation between CONL and TQQQ is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022	0.53

The correlation between CONL and TQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

CONL vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CONL	TQQQ
Financial Services	100.0%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.1%
Communication Services	-	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	7.7%
Energy	-	0.6%
Healthcare	-	4.2%
Industrials	-	2.8%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	53.8%
Utilities	-	1.4%

Return for Risk

CONL vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 2
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 1

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 36
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 36
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CONL vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CONL	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.67	0.83	-1.50
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.61	1.38	-2.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.17	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.01	1.29	-2.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.36	3.60	-4.96

CONL vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CONL Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CONL and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CONL vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -95.30%, which is greater than TQQQ's maximum drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and TQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CONL	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.30%	-81.66%	-13.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-91.79%	-36.97%	-54.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-95.30%	-58.04%	-37.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-81.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-95.30%	-25.74%	-69.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.47%	-18.49%	-38.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	70.40%	13.24%	+57.16%

Volatility

CONL vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a higher volatility of 40.73% compared to ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) at 20.41%. This indicates that CONL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CONL	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	40.73%	20.41%	+20.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	108.93%	47.79%	+61.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.25%	57.62%	+80.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	149.42%	68.04%	+81.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	149.42%	66.57%	+82.85%

CONL vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

CONL vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

CONL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.58%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CONL and TQQQ in my portfolio?

CONL and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CONL or TQQQ?

CONL has higher volatility (40.73%) compared to TQQQ (20.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONL dropped -95.30% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

Which ETF is better, CONL or TQQQ?

On 3-year performance, TQQQ leads with 43.81% vs -35.39% for CONL. On fees, TQQQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 20.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CONL or TQQQ?

Over the 3-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 43.81% return vs -35.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CONL or TQQQ?

TQQQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CONL or TQQQ?

TQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for CONL.

What is the main difference between CONL and TQQQ?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CONL and 0.95% for TQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.