CONL vs. BRKL
CONL (GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.21 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. CONL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
CONL vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CONL
- 1D
- -21.10%
- 1M
- -25.93%
- 6M
- -61.90%
- YTD
- -72.70%
- 1Y
- -88.50%
- 3Y*
- -35.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -35.80%
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $853.16 | $14.75K | $14.75K | |
| $93.31M | $92.00M | $129.00M |
CONL vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF | -28.83% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 1.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONL and BRKL is -0.21, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -0.21 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONL vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
CONL
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CONL vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CONL | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.82 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CONL vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -95.30%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONL | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.30% | -7.03% | -88.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.30% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.30% | -0.13% | -95.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.47% | -4.14% | -53.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.40% | — | — |
Volatility
CONL vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONL | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 40.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 108.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.25% | 30.99% | +107.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 149.42% | 30.99% | +118.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 149.42% | 30.99% | +118.43% |
CONL vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CONL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
CONL vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
Neither CONL nor BRKL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONL and BRKL have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONL.
CONL and BRKL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CONL and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for CONL and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer