CONI vs. TSYY
CONI (GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF) and TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CONI is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, CONI returned -48.55% vs -12.29% for TSYY. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. CONI charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSYY.
Performance
CONI vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CONI achieves a -17.97% return, which is significantly lower than TSYY's -16.60% return.
CONI
- 1D
- 12.23%
- 1M
- 36.75%
- YTD
- -17.97%
- 6M
- 18.58%
- 1Y
- -48.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -16.60%
- 6M
- -16.47%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CONI vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF | -17.97% | -70.84% | 11.76% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -16.60% | -15.96% | -0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between CONI and TSYY is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | -0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CONI vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank
CONI
TSYY
CONI vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CONI | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.96 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | -0.45 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.83 | -0.85 | +0.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CONI | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.35 | -0.39 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.56 | -0.59 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
CONI vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CONI drawdown since its inception was -94.53%, which is greater than TSYY's maximum drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONI and TSYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CONI | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.53% | -41.52% | -53.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.37% | -27.31% | -48.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.94% | -36.69% | -53.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.31% | -25.88% | -47.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 58.78% | 14.49% | +44.29% |
Volatility
CONI vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF (CONI) has a higher volatility of 38.52% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) at 4.86%. This indicates that CONI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CONI | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.52% | 4.86% | +33.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 109.30% | 19.69% | +89.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 140.53% | 31.77% | +108.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 127.77% | 37.52% | +90.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.77% | 37.52% | +90.25% |
CONI vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CONI has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSYY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
CONI vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison
CONI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than TSYY's 282.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CONI GraniteShares 2x Short COIN Daily ETF | 1.07% | 0.87% | 1.39% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 282.79% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CONI and TSYY have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CONI has higher volatility (38.52%) compared to TSYY (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CONI dropped -94.53% vs TSYY's -41.52%.
On 1-year performance, TSYY leads with -12.29% vs -48.55% for CONI. On fees, TSYY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSYY has performed better with a -12.29% return vs -48.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSYY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for CONI.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 282.79%, compared with 1.07% for CONI.
CONI is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TSYY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for CONI and 0.99% for TSYY.
CONI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CONI and TSYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer