CON.DE vs. TMRAF
CON.DE (Continental Aktiengesellschaft) and TMRAF (Tomra Systems ASA) are both stocks. CON.DE operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while TMRAF operates in Waste Management (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CON.DE returned -1.38%/yr vs 14.23%/yr for TMRAF. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CON.DE vs. TMRAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CON.DE is traded in EUR, while TMRAF is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the TMRAF values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CON.DE achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly higher than TMRAF's -24.04% return. Over the past 10 years, CON.DE has underperformed TMRAF with an annualized return of -1.38%, while TMRAF has yielded a comparatively higher 14.23% annualized return.
CON.DE
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 6.17%
- 6M
- 11.18%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- -0.41%
- 10Y*
- -1.38%
TMRAF
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- -24.04%
- 6M
- -19.02%
- 1Y
- -35.37%
- 3Y*
- -15.53%
- 5Y*
- -8.76%
- 10Y*
- 14.23%
CON.DE vs. TMRAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CON.DE Continental Aktiengesellschaft | 6.17% | 44.73% | -11.64% | 41.82% | -37.12% | -14.13% | 19.96% | 0.01% | -44.71% | 29.04% |
TMRAF Tomra Systems ASA | -24.04% | -5.58% | 21.39% | -34.09% | -22.50% | 62.26% | 39.05% | 49.57% | 55.08% | 59.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between CON.DE and TMRAF is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2007 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CON.DE vs. TMRAF — Risk / Return Rank
CON.DE
TMRAF
CON.DE vs. TMRAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Continental Aktiengesellschaft (CON.DE) and Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CON.DE | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.87 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | -0.73 | +1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | -1.33 | +4.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CON.DE | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | -0.67 | +1.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | -0.15 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.04 | 0.29 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.23 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
CON.DE vs. TMRAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CON.DE drawdown since its inception was -89.19%, which is greater than TMRAF's maximum drawdown of -72.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CON.DE and TMRAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CON.DE | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.19% | -72.48% | -16.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.17% | -48.51% | +25.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.78% | -55.43% | +25.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.10% | -72.48% | +12.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.74% | -72.48% | -4.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.23% | -64.04% | +25.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.72% | -21.48% | -9.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.54% | 26.55% | -19.01% |
Volatility
CON.DE vs. TMRAF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Continental Aktiengesellschaft (CON.DE) is 9.10%, while Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) has a volatility of 19.74%. This indicates that CON.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMRAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CON.DE | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.10% | 19.74% | -10.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.34% | 40.60% | -16.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.81% | 53.16% | -22.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.97% | 58.53% | -23.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.38% | 49.84% | -15.46% |
Dividends
CON.DE vs. TMRAF - Dividend Comparison
CON.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than TMRAF's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CON.DE Continental Aktiengesellschaft | 3.91% | 3.68% | 4.46% | 2.57% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 8.49% | 6.06% | 5.48% | 4.67% | 3.00% | 2.13% |
TMRAF Tomra Systems ASA | 0.23% | 1.55% | 1.39% | 1.49% | 1.94% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 1.62% | 4.28% | 13.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CON.DE vs. TMRAF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Continental Aktiengesellschaft and Tomra Systems ASA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CON.DE and TMRAF have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CON.DE and TMRAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer