PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CON.DE vs. RIVN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CON.DE vs. RIVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Continental Aktiengesellschaft (CON.DE) and Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CON.DE is traded in EUR, while RIVN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the RIVN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CON.DE achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly higher than RIVN's -15.42% return.


CON.DE

1D
-2.40%
1M
1.77%
YTD
6.17%
6M
11.18%
1Y
24.17%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
-0.41%
10Y*
-1.38%

RIVN

1D
-9.05%
1M
15.14%
YTD
-15.42%
6M
-7.96%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
1.53%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CON.DE vs. RIVN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CON.DE
Continental Aktiengesellschaft
6.17%44.73%-11.64%41.82%-37.12%-13.31%
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
-15.42%30.61%-39.57%23.48%-81.12%3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between CON.DE and RIVN is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2021

0.21

The correlation between CON.DE and RIVN shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CON.DE vs. RIVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CON.DE
CON.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CON.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CON.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
CON.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CON.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CON.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

RIVN
RIVN Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
RIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
RIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CON.DE vs. RIVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Continental Aktiengesellschaft (CON.DE) and Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CON.DERIVNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.11

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

0.43

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.27

0.83

+2.43

CON.DE vs. RIVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CON.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is higher than the RIVN Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CON.DE and RIVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CON.DERIVNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

0.28

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

-0.43

+0.69

Drawdowns

CON.DE vs. RIVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CON.DE drawdown since its inception was -89.19%, smaller than the maximum RIVN drawdown of -94.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CON.DE and RIVN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CON.DERIVNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.19%

-94.80%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.17%

-42.04%

+18.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.78%

-68.54%

+38.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.23%

-90.66%

+52.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.72%

-85.90%

+55.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.54%

21.53%

-13.99%

Volatility

CON.DE vs. RIVN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Continental Aktiengesellschaft (CON.DE) is 9.10%, while Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) has a volatility of 17.92%. This indicates that CON.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RIVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CON.DERIVNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.10%

17.92%

-8.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.34%

47.74%

-23.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.81%

63.61%

-32.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.97%

76.46%

-41.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.38%

76.46%

-42.08%

Dividends

CON.DE vs. RIVN - Dividend Comparison

CON.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, while RIVN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CON.DE
Continental Aktiengesellschaft
3.91%3.68%4.46%2.57%5.17%0.00%8.49%6.06%5.48%4.67%3.00%2.13%
RIVN
Rivian Automotive, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CON.DE vs. RIVN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Continental Aktiengesellschaft and Rivian Automotive, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. CON.DE values in EUR, RIVN values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


CON.DE and RIVN have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CON.DE and RIVN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer